Showing posts with label Entitlements. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Entitlements. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 26, 2018

Seven Reality Checks On Social Security

There are seven myths about Social Security. Here are the reality checks.


Social Security is an Entitlement - that is a program the government is required to pay whether it finances it or not; those arguing it isn't an entitlement claim it can't be because beneficiaries contributed to it - except that money goes to someone else.


Social Security wasn't robbed by politicians, it went bankrupt precisely by being a money shuffle.



Social Security pays out benefits its beneficiaries did not contribute to - again, because it is nothing but a money shuffle where someone pays for someone else's benefits.


Social Security's insolvency is far earlier than the often-claimed date of 2034.


Social Security never was "self-funed" - government was paying for it from the beginning.


The "rich" can't finance it.


Privatization was never attempted, despite media mythologizing to that effect

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Pension Bankrupcy Wants Bailouts Again

The multi-trillion dollar bankrupcies of pensions is a continuing problem and some want them bailed out. They shouldn't.

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

Hidden Debt Hidden Deficits

First this repost from May 15:

A new study has been released showing how state and local governments are $1.91 to $3.4 trillion in debt due to unfunded pensions.

Additional information comes here.

See also the progressive bankruptcy of Connecticut and Illinois.    

Update September 20: There is also this September video Entitlements And The Bidget.

Thursday, May 04, 2017

The Pension Crisis

First published on November 22, 1016:

The state pension crisis has saddled the next generation with a multi-trillion-dollar debt crisis - this piece looks at Florida's while this one looks at California's.


UPDATE, May 4, 2017: An additional study showcases public employee greed.

Thursday, March 09, 2017

The CBO And Obamacare

A lot of people don't trust the CBO - and it's because it is so often wrong. Some examples are presented where it gets it wrong.

Of course being flawed doesn't mean its data isn't worthwhile - as its recent estimate on Republicans' repeal effort shows it will among other things repeal penalties on employers as well as on individuals.

Also worth reading is this optimistic epistle on Obamacare's repeal.
UPDATE, August 17: The CBO's math used for Obamacare turns out to be fraudulent.

Thursday, December 22, 2016

The Leftist-Ideological Complex

The Military-Industrial Complex was President Eisenhower making an economic point in a military conetxt


..".  . vast bureaucracies of civil servants, no longer servants and no longer civil." (Winston Churchill)

In 1961 President Dwight Eisenhower warned of the danger of a military-industrial complex. This powerful public-private collaboration, he said, had the potential to exert unwarranted influence over America's democratic processes. A half-century later, there are still those on the left who cling to this fear. But it seems that Eisenhower's warning had its intended effect—and perhaps then some. In 1961 defense spending constituted 9.1 percent of the gross domestic product, and there were 2,483,000 uniformed military personnel. Today, defense spending is 3.2 percent of GDP and 1,390,000 men and women serve in the uniformed military. If this behemoth is threatening America's democratic processes, it is not doing so very successfully.


My own sidebar - Eisenhower didn't oppose massive military spending - his enemy in the Republican Party Robert Taft "was more liberal than me" when it came to domestic spending. Eisenhower in fact feared a welfare state - what Lyndon Johnson and a Democratic Congress wound up hoisting on the nation.


There is, however, another interlocking public-private collaboration that is at once more insidious, more powerful, and more straightforwardly partisan: the liberal ideological complex. We do not always see this collaboration so clearly, because we tend to view each aspect of it as unique and not part of a larger picture. We look, for example, at public sector unions as a labor issue. We look at funding for Planned Parenthood through the lens of abortion policy. We look at EPA regulations and grants in terms of global warming and job destruction. And so on and so forth, down to the smallest, most narrowly tailored grant awards of the federal government.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

The Social Security Truth The NY Times Can't Admit

The NY Times is bloviating again about Social Security and once again can't admit the truth about the bankruptcy of this and other entitlements.

Some bottom lines -

Social Security costs have outrun the economy's ability to sustain the program, and it's only getting worse.

Politicians won't raise taxes to keep it solvent - that tax increases are advocated for Social Security merely illustrates the program's unsoundness.

Social Security is draining workers' standard of living.

The real problem with any entitlement - it is NOT a savings program, it is a money shuffle.

The program is becoming like collapsing state pension programs.