It's early summer but that only means NFL training camps are about five weeks away, and the preview magazines are out with their prognostications. So presented below is a list of NFL 2013 questions and my take on answers -
********************
WHY ARE THE DENVER BRONCOS PICKED TO MAKE THE SUPERBOWL? - Over and over I'm seeing previews picking the Broncos to make the Superbowl - and by beating the New England Patriots in the AFC Championship Game to boot. I'm baffled, because the Patriots are the better of the two teams and Tom Brady is the superior quarterback to Peyton Manning. Manning's pattern of regular-season mastery and playoff collapse repeated itself in 2012 just the same as it's done for all but one playoff season in his career - and it was the eighth time in twelve playoff runs that Manning failed to win even one game - while Tom Brady broke a tie with Joe Montana for most career playoff wins in 2012.
Moreover, the rap that Manning's throwing strength deteriorates in cold weather turned out to be true.
----------
CAN THE RAVENS MAKE THE PLAYOFFS? - A championship team basically blew itself up after winning the Superbowl and a rumor is that part of the veteran exodus was alienation of veteran players by coach John Harbaugh, but given the program Ozzie Newsome and company have built in Baltimore the Ravens should not be terribly worried going into 2013. The recent history of Superbowl winners, though, isn't favorable - none have returned in consecutive years since New England 2003-4, and defending Superbowl champs have won exactly one playoff game (New England over Jacksonville in 2005) in the last eight seasons.
There also remain questions about Joe Flacco, who despite his often-petulent protestations of elite quarterback status continues to show too much inconsistency - he had a good half in the Superbowl, not a good game.
----------
WHY DID THE PATRIOTS JETTISON WES WELKER? - Simple - they'd gone as far as they could go with him, and for all his volume stats he's a one-trick pony - the ultimate slot receiver. He depended on others to be the focal point of the Patriots offense (Randy Moss, Rob Gronkowski, briefly Deion Branch), and when he had to be the focal point the Patriots struggled.
The myth is pushed that his replacement, Danny Amendola, can't stay on the field. The fact is Amedola's injuries have been quite serious, not the kind of knicks that fell true soft players (such as Sammy Morris, who never stayed on the field with the Patriots).
----------
WHY DID THE PATRIOTS SIGN TIM TEBOW? - Because Josh McDaniels, showing he wields a powerful influence on personnel decisions in Foxboro, isn't letting go of the guy he drafted when in Denver in 2010. No one else had any interest in Tebow after he was cut by the Jets. The idea that Tebow was brought in as a utility player is nonsensical; he's a quarterback with seemingly insuperable weaknesses in football IQ, throwing mechanics, and general ability to secure the ball. The Patriots showed the league how to beat Tebow in December 2011, and the result is Tebow lost four of his last five starts as a quarterback; and when the Jets signed him they saw for themselves his hopelessness as a player; their hope of using him for multiple positions was a stupid fantasy from Day One, because he can't handle that.
The notion remains in some minds that Tebow could sit for a few years and learn from Tom Brady and Bill Belichick - call it The Myth Of The Next Steve Young, a myth already seen with the likes of Kordell Stewart and Michael Vick. Steve Young showed he could play even in his rawness with the late-1980s 49ers; nowhere has Tim Tebow showed anything close to that.
If he stays in Foxboro I can't see any scenario beyond the next Damon Huard - scout team quarterback extraordinaire.
----------
WHY IS REX RYAN STILL A HEAD COACH? - Really because no one else is available right now. The collapse of the NY Jets has been held as a referendum on the incompetence of Mark Sanchez and the Jets front office, but it's worse than that - Rex Ryan created a cancerous football culture that held ego and talent above team, where image was more important than creating a disciplined culture. It divided the locker room when he was in Baltimore - it's curious few noticed the Ravens going out of their way not to hire Ryan when they fired Brian Billick - and clearly it's done the same in New York.
----------
WILL MIAMI AND BUFFALO EVER BE RELEVENT AGAIN? - Miami certainly looks to be improving now, with a quarterback in Ryan Tannehill who actually looks capable of the NFL. Buffalo is harder to gauge given the wholesale blowup of the front office and coaching staff. Doug Marrone, though, looks to bring in some fresh ideas to a club in dire need of fresh idceas.
----------
IS PITTSBURGH IN TROUBLE? - The Steelers have regressed the last season-plus beginning with the playoff loss to Tim Tebow that may have been the worst gameplan for a playoff game ever seen. Adding Todd Haley didn't work in 2012 and despite stories that Ben Roethlisberger is "embracing" Haley's offense, Haley's record as a coach looks poor. 2013 may be a third-place season for the Steelers.
----------
IS THE AFC SOUTH A TWO-TEAM RACE? - Right now it is, but Houston and Indianapolis showcased serious weaknesses - Houston's inability to handle quality teams at the end, and terrible turnover and overall points differentials for the Colts. The Texans don't look any better now than they did after getting smacked in the playoffs, and Andrew Luck is the real deal but also vulnerable to a sophmore slump.
Jacksonville is in long-term rebuild, while Tennessee has added to shore up their O-line and overall defense - two shocking weaknesses in 2012 after a solid 2011 for both. Tennessee needs Jake Locker to step up after a very rough 2012 where he missed six games with shoulder injury and was radically hot and cold yet showed enough to think he can become a winner.
----------
CAN ANYONE HANDLE DENVER IN THE AFC WEST? - Mostly no. The one team that might remains San Diego; Philip Rivers has been radically uneven the last three seasons but overall is too good not to contend. Kansas City has Andy Reid but we need to see the Chiefs in action first before we can say whether they're improving or not. Oakland, meanwhile, is stuck in the same rut Al Davis put it in, and his heir apparent looks like the slob in the movies rather than any kind of competent owner.
----------
WHY IS TONY ROMO STILL IN THE LEAGUE? - Because Jerry Jones has the same incompetence level as a GM as the late Mr. Davis; his team-building efforts have been consistent failures and the Cowboys have been a consistently mediocre or worse team since their last Superbowl. Tony Romo is seen as a good quarterback even though by any objective measure he isn't - he plays Brett Favre football, which means chuck it upfield, reading defenses be damned. Romo's work ethic got called out by Jerry Jones, but there is no reason to think anything will be different for a guy who's been a starter now entering his eighth season - a guy who signed on in 2003 and got passed over by at least three quarterbacks before he was thrown in during 2006.
----------
ARE THE NY GIANTS ANYTHING? - Not really. They somehow won two Superbowls under Tom Coughlin, and don't have another playoff win in that span; they've missed the playoffs three of the last five seasons, and the pattern has always held - they race out of the gate fast, then collapse in the second half of the season. In 2012 they lost yet again to the Eagles even as the Andy Reid era was collapsing in ruins.
----------
WILL THE REDSKINS GO TO THE NEXT LEVEL? - No. People have grossly overrated Mike Shanahan as a coach and team builder; after John Elway retired Shanahan's teams have won one playoff game; his personnel judgement has been a little shaky, as he went with the idiotic Jay Cutler even when Cutler showed himself to have nothing beyond volume stats going for him. Robert Griffin III looks to be the real deal, but that depends on whether he elevates his quarterbacking - and also on whether Shanahan actually gets things right.
----------
ARE THE PACKERS A PAPER TIGER? - Hell yes. Aaron Rodgers is held as an elite quarterback, yet no one seems to notice his inability to lead a comeback. When the Packers can't race out to a big lead, or they fall behind, they have invariably failed - the infamous loss to Seattle last year was not the Packers getting robbed, it was the Packers getting exposed as front-running phonies. And it isn't just Rodgers - the much-praised defense with Clay Matthews et al always falters against some kind of quality team (New York in 2011, San Francisco 2012).
----------
WILL CHRISTIAN PONDER SURPRISE? - Yes. People have downed his 2012 season, ignoring that he improved as the season went on and outdueled Aaron Rodgers in the season finale.
----------
WILL THE LIONS REBOUND? - Yes, because they have the real deal in terms of a roster in general and key positions such as quarterback in particular. Turnover differential was the killer in 2012.
----------
WILL THE SAINTS REBOUND IN 2013? - Yes, but the NFC South has now become a deep division with the still-potent Falcons, a Tampa Bay Bucs squad with huge potential, and an improving Carolina Panthers squad. It's more than plausible the last-place team in this division could finish 8-8 or even 9-7, reminiscent of 2008.
----------
IS CAM NEWTON READY TO TAKE THE NEXT STEP? - His maturity issues hurt in the first half of 2012, but he was playing better football than the Falcons Matt Ryan at the season's end. That bodes well for 2012.
----------
IS MATT RYAN A ONE-SHOT WONDER? - Yes. The Falcons remain potent but his playoff performances remain bad enough not to take him seriously as a Superbowl contender.
----------
HOW DEEP IS THE NFC WEST? - Deep enough to possibly send three teams to the playoffs. The 49ers and Seahawks have become elite teams while the Rams were 2-1-1 against both last year and should be even better in Jeff Fisher's second season.
----------
WILL THERE BE NFL TEAMS IN LOS ANGELES AND LONDON? - No. Despite stories that a London NFL franchise is something like a done deal, the logistics of stationing an NFL team in London simply don't work between timezones, the cost of shuttling equipment to and from London, and whether players even want to be there, plus there really isn't much beyond a niche audience in London for the NFL. LA is even worse as far as fan indifference goes, and California's thoroughly screwed-up economics will only hurt efforts to build a new stadium.
And so it goes as we count down to 2013 training camps.
Friday, June 21, 2013
Thursday, June 20, 2013
The Muslim Second Generation
The "Second Generation" of Muslim youth has something fundamentally wrong with it - its increased savagery and mindlessness.
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
The Obamacare Costs Con
Obamacare was sold as a used car con, and the costs are coming in, in addition to illustrating the refusal of Democrats to admit being wrong.
Release Osama Bin Laden’s Files on Taliban
Osama Bin Laden’s Files on Taliban have not been released by the Obama administration. The Guardian in the UK writes what may be the reason why - "The news (within the Bin Laden files) will undermine hopes of a negotiated peace in Afghanistan."
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Monday, June 17, 2013
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Technology of the past and future
Even in 2035, the internal combustion engine will power 99% of US vehicles - showcasing how "old" technology can still be new.
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
The Myth of an American Coup In Iran
In 1953 an Iranian coup overthrew the nation's ruling aristocrat. The CIA has long been accused of fostering the coup, but the reality is it played no role.
UPDATE June 17, 2017: New documents have been released about the 1953 coup and they show the US was not involved.
UPDATE June 4 2018: a new piece examines unanswered questions about the West's undermining of the Shah and enabling of the Ayatollahs' coup in Iran.
UPDATE June 17, 2017: New documents have been released about the 1953 coup and they show the US was not involved.
UPDATE June 4 2018: a new piece examines unanswered questions about the West's undermining of the Shah and enabling of the Ayatollahs' coup in Iran.
Monday, June 03, 2013
Off To Pocono
The Winston Cup cars head north from Dover to Pocono, and do so with a season that is turning more bizarre. The Mason-Dixon 400 turned out to be the strangest finish in awhile after Jimmie Johnson was blackflagged for jumping the restart and Tony Stewart got the win after passing Juan Montoya - that Montoya was anywhere near the lead at all by itself is bizarre given the collapse of his Winston Cup career.
The win for Stewart was a shocker because of the reality his team isn't very good now; that he tried to bite a reporter's head off at Dover for asking about rumors of personnel changes in his team comes across as petulant and lacking credibility - something is going on for the rumors to be circulating at all.
Something is also going on with Toyota. Once again the Camry fleet has the opportunity to wrest control of the series from Chevrolet and the Toyotas continue blowing it. Toyota teams need to start questioning whether the company over-centralized the engine program because the issue of engine failures is disturbingly frequent across the fleet.
Martin Truex's engine failure illustrates this, though his run also showed the lack of killer instinct that has permeated his entire career.
Denny Hamlin meanwhile is on a pole binge of late, though he sounded pessimistic for Pocono because the place was repaved recently and "it's a whole new track" now - "We're not the best anymore at that track," he said. That he ran as well as he did at Dover so soon after coming back was certainly encouraging.
Then there is the Penske Racing saga. Brad Keselowski's postrace problems at Dover continue a trend where a fundamental shift in power within the organization appears to have occurred. Keselowski now looks like yesterday's news and Joey Logano appears to be the #1 there.
The larger issue of Ford is also a story, as the Ford fleet looks much weaker than usual now. Within the Roush organization has come the story that Matt Kenseth's departure has left a leadership void, and it looks to be getting worse.
They all will resume the season at Pocono, and while one shouldn't hold much optimism for the Generation Six racecar, the season has had enough nutty stuff happen that a track that has seen a good share of surprises may produce another.
The win for Stewart was a shocker because of the reality his team isn't very good now; that he tried to bite a reporter's head off at Dover for asking about rumors of personnel changes in his team comes across as petulant and lacking credibility - something is going on for the rumors to be circulating at all.
Something is also going on with Toyota. Once again the Camry fleet has the opportunity to wrest control of the series from Chevrolet and the Toyotas continue blowing it. Toyota teams need to start questioning whether the company over-centralized the engine program because the issue of engine failures is disturbingly frequent across the fleet.
Martin Truex's engine failure illustrates this, though his run also showed the lack of killer instinct that has permeated his entire career.
Denny Hamlin meanwhile is on a pole binge of late, though he sounded pessimistic for Pocono because the place was repaved recently and "it's a whole new track" now - "We're not the best anymore at that track," he said. That he ran as well as he did at Dover so soon after coming back was certainly encouraging.
Then there is the Penske Racing saga. Brad Keselowski's postrace problems at Dover continue a trend where a fundamental shift in power within the organization appears to have occurred. Keselowski now looks like yesterday's news and Joey Logano appears to be the #1 there.
The larger issue of Ford is also a story, as the Ford fleet looks much weaker than usual now. Within the Roush organization has come the story that Matt Kenseth's departure has left a leadership void, and it looks to be getting worse.
They all will resume the season at Pocono, and while one shouldn't hold much optimism for the Generation Six racecar, the season has had enough nutty stuff happen that a track that has seen a good share of surprises may produce another.
Friday, May 31, 2013
What to Do With Fannie and Freddie
What to Do With Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae - the ultimate goal needs to be - kill them both, because they are a proven disease.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Brian France's Nose Grows
Brian France spoke to reporters before the Charlotte 300 Nationwide race and talked about several issues. But a telling point came when he defended the heavy fine to Denny Hamlin when he criticized the Generation Six racecar; in response Hamlin wrote on his Twitter account, "Someone's nose is growing."
France discussed the Winston Cup schedule in light of Bruton Smith's deranged rant saying he may move Charlotte's National 500 to Vegas, this before another rant about his tax fights with Cabarrus County, NC. France didn't offer any particular insight in his comments, just the usual points about the mixture of events.
The schedule is good as it is; the only real changes needed are to go back to 500 mile race distances at places like Pocono and Michigan and to push start times to earlier for better convenience for trackside audiences - the argument about later start times and TV ratings doesn't work. I'd also like Texas World Speedway to be able to host some races.
But the line about not crossing a line about "our product" is the kind of self-deception that has permeated Brian France's tenure in NASCAR - the fact is the product ISN'T as good as it needs to be. France talks about continuing developmental work on the Generation Six, but given how much work went into it before, one can't feel confidence that NASCAR can make this thing work. Though just four months into the season, the Gen-6 has already proven a flop, though its next two plate races offer some reason for optimism.
Someone's nose keeps growing in NASCAR.
France discussed the Winston Cup schedule in light of Bruton Smith's deranged rant saying he may move Charlotte's National 500 to Vegas, this before another rant about his tax fights with Cabarrus County, NC. France didn't offer any particular insight in his comments, just the usual points about the mixture of events.
The schedule is good as it is; the only real changes needed are to go back to 500 mile race distances at places like Pocono and Michigan and to push start times to earlier for better convenience for trackside audiences - the argument about later start times and TV ratings doesn't work. I'd also like Texas World Speedway to be able to host some races.
But the line about not crossing a line about "our product" is the kind of self-deception that has permeated Brian France's tenure in NASCAR - the fact is the product ISN'T as good as it needs to be. France talks about continuing developmental work on the Generation Six, but given how much work went into it before, one can't feel confidence that NASCAR can make this thing work. Though just four months into the season, the Gen-6 has already proven a flop, though its next two plate races offer some reason for optimism.
Someone's nose keeps growing in NASCAR.
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
NASCAR's Long-Term Game Plan
With the 2013 season proceding Mike Mulhern takes a look at NASCAR's "game plan" for renewing the sport's popularity. Mulhern asks what in this game plan is working and what isn't.
My own view on the plan -
What NASCAR is doing is trying to push star power with the drivers, get in people's face through every social media outlet possible, trying to "make a NASCAR weekend about more than just the racing," trying to improve "product relevance," and trying to attract other demographics.
By any look at all this, so far it isn't happening.
The sport's fanbase is still what it always has been, and the attempts to market to the "pinkhat" crowd simply aren't working - the same thing has been happening with the Boston Red Sox of Roush-Fenway co-owners John W. Henry, Larry Lucchino, and Tom Werner, whose belligerent marketing of The Brand drew in the pinkhat crowd and angered the true fanbase of the team to where the Red Sox's relevance to New England has dropped quite dramatically. The Sox's marketing efforts in 2013 have changed noticeably back toward a stronger marketing of baseball as opposed to the Red Sox Brand.
The first effort in NASCAR's marketing effort is of course the Generation Six racecar, and that part of the scheme is manifestly not working - the Gen-6 is not terribly different from the much-mocked Car Of Tomorrow and after a promising month where the racing showed some signs of improving, the competitive ennui of the sport's last ten-plus seasons has returned, low-lighted by an abysmal All Star weekend.
This failure really is the first of the two big individual failings in the sport - to put it bluntly, where did 60-lead-change-racing go?
Constantly forgotten by so many in the sport is how its popularity first took off in the 1970s when, despite the factory withdrawal and economic crunch of the time, the competitiveness of the racing took off - 1971-80 the sport saw over 30 races break 40 official lead changes with another two dozen or so flirting with 40 and memorable last-laps at such races as the 1974 Volunteer 500 at Bristol and 1975 Yankee 400 at Michigan. 1981-4 it continued as 15 races broke 40 lead changes with Talladega in 1984 breaking 68 lead changes twice. Even with the beginning of the Dead Lane Era in 1985 there were still races that at least flirted with 40 lead changes as well as wild finishes in the next 15-plus years of the sport. In that period Talladega has been by far the best racing anywhere, breaking 40 official lead changes 21 times after 1984, while Daytona nearly reached 40 in 1993 and 1996 and then broke that number six times in the last twelve years.
As the technology arms race has increased in the last 2.5 decades, however, the result has been stifling of passing, speeds too high for the tracks to handle, and safety issues, plus the second of the sport's great individual failings - spiralling costs and utter lack of any cost/spending controls. NASCAR's recent TV deals for Cup have been in the billions - yet it is harder and harder for sponsors to stay and the dying off of teams that rose in the first half of the 2000-10 decade has been a graphic downfall for the sport.
Related to the technology arms race has been NASCAR's idiotic "Green" initiatives, pushing as they do the perpetual myth that the environment is in some kind of serious crisis that must be dealt with - that the environment is in fact quite healthy and in no particular need of "rescuing" makes eco initiatives ultimately a waste.
Oversold is that NASCAR somehow was wrong to hold onto carburated pushrod technology for as long as it has - the fact that technology still works makes nonsense of arguments against it. If anything NASCAR was wrong to abandon carburation; its experiment with EFI has accomplished nothing as far as betterment of the sport goes.
**********
For all of NASCAR's efforts at broading the fanbase etc. they have simply gone about it the wrong way.
What is needed is great racing. The Winston/Aarons 500 weekend was a boost for the sport because it produced superior racing - 47 lead changes among 16 drivers in the Nationwide 312-miler and the most amazing finishes the sport has seen in decades in both - the Ron Bouchard pass in the 312, David Ragan's spectacular charge to victory in the 500.
Give us back the lead changes - then NASCAR will have something that it can market that's actually worth watching. It's to be understood not every race can break 60 lead changes, but the sport can only benefit if it saw more than a few such races during the year - the much-hated "cookie cutter" tracks are manifestly capable of such races because they've had them before.
The lead changes produce the excitement that draws in fans and makes them want to learn about the sport. Billy France understood this when he was in charge of NASCAR; Brian France does not, hence his constant pushing of The Brand.
The bottom line is this -
NASCAR needs to figure out getting the competition package to where 60 lead changes is not the exception.
NASCAR needs to reign in the overmarketing.
NASCAR needs to figure out how to reduce the spending and thus improve the sport's affordability.
This is a proven formula for improving a sport's popularity.
My own view on the plan -
What NASCAR is doing is trying to push star power with the drivers, get in people's face through every social media outlet possible, trying to "make a NASCAR weekend about more than just the racing," trying to improve "product relevance," and trying to attract other demographics.
By any look at all this, so far it isn't happening.
The sport's fanbase is still what it always has been, and the attempts to market to the "pinkhat" crowd simply aren't working - the same thing has been happening with the Boston Red Sox of Roush-Fenway co-owners John W. Henry, Larry Lucchino, and Tom Werner, whose belligerent marketing of The Brand drew in the pinkhat crowd and angered the true fanbase of the team to where the Red Sox's relevance to New England has dropped quite dramatically. The Sox's marketing efforts in 2013 have changed noticeably back toward a stronger marketing of baseball as opposed to the Red Sox Brand.
The first effort in NASCAR's marketing effort is of course the Generation Six racecar, and that part of the scheme is manifestly not working - the Gen-6 is not terribly different from the much-mocked Car Of Tomorrow and after a promising month where the racing showed some signs of improving, the competitive ennui of the sport's last ten-plus seasons has returned, low-lighted by an abysmal All Star weekend.
This failure really is the first of the two big individual failings in the sport - to put it bluntly, where did 60-lead-change-racing go?
Constantly forgotten by so many in the sport is how its popularity first took off in the 1970s when, despite the factory withdrawal and economic crunch of the time, the competitiveness of the racing took off - 1971-80 the sport saw over 30 races break 40 official lead changes with another two dozen or so flirting with 40 and memorable last-laps at such races as the 1974 Volunteer 500 at Bristol and 1975 Yankee 400 at Michigan. 1981-4 it continued as 15 races broke 40 lead changes with Talladega in 1984 breaking 68 lead changes twice. Even with the beginning of the Dead Lane Era in 1985 there were still races that at least flirted with 40 lead changes as well as wild finishes in the next 15-plus years of the sport. In that period Talladega has been by far the best racing anywhere, breaking 40 official lead changes 21 times after 1984, while Daytona nearly reached 40 in 1993 and 1996 and then broke that number six times in the last twelve years.
As the technology arms race has increased in the last 2.5 decades, however, the result has been stifling of passing, speeds too high for the tracks to handle, and safety issues, plus the second of the sport's great individual failings - spiralling costs and utter lack of any cost/spending controls. NASCAR's recent TV deals for Cup have been in the billions - yet it is harder and harder for sponsors to stay and the dying off of teams that rose in the first half of the 2000-10 decade has been a graphic downfall for the sport.
Related to the technology arms race has been NASCAR's idiotic "Green" initiatives, pushing as they do the perpetual myth that the environment is in some kind of serious crisis that must be dealt with - that the environment is in fact quite healthy and in no particular need of "rescuing" makes eco initiatives ultimately a waste.
Oversold is that NASCAR somehow was wrong to hold onto carburated pushrod technology for as long as it has - the fact that technology still works makes nonsense of arguments against it. If anything NASCAR was wrong to abandon carburation; its experiment with EFI has accomplished nothing as far as betterment of the sport goes.
**********
For all of NASCAR's efforts at broading the fanbase etc. they have simply gone about it the wrong way.
What is needed is great racing. The Winston/Aarons 500 weekend was a boost for the sport because it produced superior racing - 47 lead changes among 16 drivers in the Nationwide 312-miler and the most amazing finishes the sport has seen in decades in both - the Ron Bouchard pass in the 312, David Ragan's spectacular charge to victory in the 500.
Give us back the lead changes - then NASCAR will have something that it can market that's actually worth watching. It's to be understood not every race can break 60 lead changes, but the sport can only benefit if it saw more than a few such races during the year - the much-hated "cookie cutter" tracks are manifestly capable of such races because they've had them before.
The lead changes produce the excitement that draws in fans and makes them want to learn about the sport. Billy France understood this when he was in charge of NASCAR; Brian France does not, hence his constant pushing of The Brand.
The bottom line is this -
NASCAR needs to figure out getting the competition package to where 60 lead changes is not the exception.
NASCAR needs to reign in the overmarketing.
NASCAR needs to figure out how to reduce the spending and thus improve the sport's affordability.
This is a proven formula for improving a sport's popularity.
Monday, May 20, 2013
Washington Post Attacks Benghazi Talking Points
The Washington Post has gone on the attack against Republicans and "conservative media" over the issue of the Obama regime's dishonest justifications for not responding to enemy attack against Americans in Benghazi. The Post's attack gets a detailed rebuttal. White House flak Dan Pfeiffer also goes on the attack against Republicans and gets its wrong. The bottom line is that people who think Republicans have somehow overreached are wrong - the Obama administration was caught red-handed as not only being wholly unprepared for the Benghazi attack but utterly dishonest about it to the point that it waged a propaganda campaign justifying the attack by citing a bogus Youtube video that no one saw.
And it continues with the NY Times' bogus history of the attack by David Kirkpatrick.
And it continues with the NY Times' bogus history of the attack by David Kirkpatrick.
Sunday, May 19, 2013
All Star And Gen Six Fiascos
The 2013 All Star Race at Charlotte saw the latest gimmick format hoping to promote more passing and also to answer wins by Jimmie Johnson where he "gamed" the previous system to get favorable late track position. The newest format used four segments and the average finish of those segments to set pitstop entry for the drivers. It contained its own failure that went overlooked by everyone - it set the pitstop, not the restart order for the final ten-lap segment. By doing so it allowed Johnson to "game" the system again via a faster stop.
In short the new gimmick failed like the others have failed, and the best average finish concept was poorly presented by NASCAR and by the FOX broadcasters.
Johnson's victory via "gaming" of the system also didn't sit well with fans, while the actual race was yet another exercise in competitive ennui, despite a few sideswipes between cars, notably Ricky Stenhouse's crash with Mark Martin as well as Brad Keselowski's blown transmission. The Busch brothers won all four segments - Kurt Busch's efforts were about the only competitive novelty of the race given the low-budget nature of the Barney Visser raceteam.
There are two fiascos at work here. The first is the concept of the All Star Race, an event long hyped for action and for the shackles of points racing not being there, but which has rarely produced memorable competition - 1994 remains the best All Star race because there was actual racing for the win, between Sterling Marlin, Geoff Bodine, and Ken Schrader, amid the usual spate of crashes. The All Star Race has seen repeated changes in its format to entice harder racing, and it has always failed to deliver.
One has to serious ask the question - is it time to end the All Star Race and instead use the money for a 37th points race? It seems the answer is yes - the All Star Race has accomplished nothing for the sport and the market for extra points races is still there - certainly giving back Atlanta its spring race would be a better idea than an All Star Race at Charlotte.
**********
The second fiasco is the Generation Six racecar. The All Star Race was yet another exercise in aeropush, something the sport was supposed to have solved long ago but which it seems incapable of solving. It's old hat to point out that dirty air is supposed to create a drafting effect to increase passing - but the fact a drafting effect was noticeable in the Friday night Truck 200-miler makes this relevant yet again. That the sport is not seeing any change where the cars want to run in dirty air is nothing but an indictment of the sanctioning body yet again for inability to solve what is supposed to be a solveable problem.
Bob Pockrass raised the idea of running a softer tire, and so has Dave Moody - as though the sport hasn't already seen this can't work, because it hasn't. No, the issue isn't tires, it's too much horsepower, insufficient grip, and aeropush. The Trucks, the NASCAR Modifieds at New Hampshire - the sport has seen that restricting horsepower and blasting open air create passing. The draft needs to be more important than handling - it has been the solution for racing forever.
**********
The All Star Race also showed the competitive lock put on the sport this year by Hendrick Motorsports and Joe Gibbs Racing, even with Kurt Busch's superb showing in the Visser Chevy and the surprising second for Joey Logano and the Penske #22. Six of the top ten were Hendrick/JGR cars while the Roush Fords were terrible - pole sitter Carl Edwards never got anything going while nobody else running a Ford got anywhere close to the top ten. The RCR Chevys weren't all that stout; they ran decent in the preliminary Showdown, but a hooligan race isn't the feature and their poor showing is a bad sign for the 600.
So it ended as basically yet another test session for the 600, and it showcased that what promise the Gen-6 had looks to be gone.
Johnson's victory via "gaming" of the system also didn't sit well with fans, while the actual race was yet another exercise in competitive ennui, despite a few sideswipes between cars, notably Ricky Stenhouse's crash with Mark Martin as well as Brad Keselowski's blown transmission. The Busch brothers won all four segments - Kurt Busch's efforts were about the only competitive novelty of the race given the low-budget nature of the Barney Visser raceteam.
There are two fiascos at work here. The first is the concept of the All Star Race, an event long hyped for action and for the shackles of points racing not being there, but which has rarely produced memorable competition - 1994 remains the best All Star race because there was actual racing for the win, between Sterling Marlin, Geoff Bodine, and Ken Schrader, amid the usual spate of crashes. The All Star Race has seen repeated changes in its format to entice harder racing, and it has always failed to deliver.
One has to serious ask the question - is it time to end the All Star Race and instead use the money for a 37th points race? It seems the answer is yes - the All Star Race has accomplished nothing for the sport and the market for extra points races is still there - certainly giving back Atlanta its spring race would be a better idea than an All Star Race at Charlotte.
**********
The second fiasco is the Generation Six racecar. The All Star Race was yet another exercise in aeropush, something the sport was supposed to have solved long ago but which it seems incapable of solving. It's old hat to point out that dirty air is supposed to create a drafting effect to increase passing - but the fact a drafting effect was noticeable in the Friday night Truck 200-miler makes this relevant yet again. That the sport is not seeing any change where the cars want to run in dirty air is nothing but an indictment of the sanctioning body yet again for inability to solve what is supposed to be a solveable problem.
Bob Pockrass raised the idea of running a softer tire, and so has Dave Moody - as though the sport hasn't already seen this can't work, because it hasn't. No, the issue isn't tires, it's too much horsepower, insufficient grip, and aeropush. The Trucks, the NASCAR Modifieds at New Hampshire - the sport has seen that restricting horsepower and blasting open air create passing. The draft needs to be more important than handling - it has been the solution for racing forever.
**********
The All Star Race also showed the competitive lock put on the sport this year by Hendrick Motorsports and Joe Gibbs Racing, even with Kurt Busch's superb showing in the Visser Chevy and the surprising second for Joey Logano and the Penske #22. Six of the top ten were Hendrick/JGR cars while the Roush Fords were terrible - pole sitter Carl Edwards never got anything going while nobody else running a Ford got anywhere close to the top ten. The RCR Chevys weren't all that stout; they ran decent in the preliminary Showdown, but a hooligan race isn't the feature and their poor showing is a bad sign for the 600.
So it ended as basically yet another test session for the 600, and it showcased that what promise the Gen-6 had looks to be gone.
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Thursday, May 16, 2013
All Star Race Pit Rule Should Be First Step
For the 2013 All Star Race NASCAR announced that for the race's qualifying format - where cars run laps at speed then make a pitstop, the cumulative time serving as the qualifying time - there will be no pit speed limit. Jim Utter of the Charlotte Observor is concerned about it being a bad precedent.
It is not. It is a twenty-years overdue change and it should be a first step. Pit speed limits were implemented in April 1991 when NASCAR was stumbling to respond to pit crashes in 1989-90. Overlooked in the whole controversy was why these crashes were happening where they generally were not before 1989 - they were happening because NASCAR (starting in late March 1989) was closing pit road when the yellow comes out, bunching up the field and basically throwing them onto pit road all at once. Pit crashes escalated sharply, yet NASCAR never considered dropping the pit closure rule that is the real reason for these pit crashes.
If NASCAR had simply stopped closing pit road under yellow and thus allowed cars to pit of their own volition instead of when NASCAR decided to throw them all in at once, one cannot see any scenario where pit road would be more dangerous - because when NASCAR didn't have all these pit rules, pit road was not a particularly dangerous place; mass pitting was not quite as frequent as it has been in the era with pit closure because cars didn't always pit at once.
The pit closure rule and subsequent additional pit road rules are simply a manifestation of NASCAR's biggest problem - the refusal to let go of control. NASCAR should not be closing pit road at all and the offiiciating tower should not have the control of the racing it has, because the outcome of the race is too often determined by the officiating tower more than the racers - pit "speeding" penalties should never be a part of racing.
Far from being a bad precedent, this qualifying session rule eliminating pit speed limits should be a first step toward taking away the controls the officiating tower has and giving it back to the racers.
It is not. It is a twenty-years overdue change and it should be a first step. Pit speed limits were implemented in April 1991 when NASCAR was stumbling to respond to pit crashes in 1989-90. Overlooked in the whole controversy was why these crashes were happening where they generally were not before 1989 - they were happening because NASCAR (starting in late March 1989) was closing pit road when the yellow comes out, bunching up the field and basically throwing them onto pit road all at once. Pit crashes escalated sharply, yet NASCAR never considered dropping the pit closure rule that is the real reason for these pit crashes.
If NASCAR had simply stopped closing pit road under yellow and thus allowed cars to pit of their own volition instead of when NASCAR decided to throw them all in at once, one cannot see any scenario where pit road would be more dangerous - because when NASCAR didn't have all these pit rules, pit road was not a particularly dangerous place; mass pitting was not quite as frequent as it has been in the era with pit closure because cars didn't always pit at once.
The pit closure rule and subsequent additional pit road rules are simply a manifestation of NASCAR's biggest problem - the refusal to let go of control. NASCAR should not be closing pit road at all and the offiiciating tower should not have the control of the racing it has, because the outcome of the race is too often determined by the officiating tower more than the racers - pit "speeding" penalties should never be a part of racing.
Far from being a bad precedent, this qualifying session rule eliminating pit speed limits should be a first step toward taking away the controls the officiating tower has and giving it back to the racers.
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Obama's Arsenal Of Smoking Guns
Benghazi has provided an arsenal of smoking guns against Obama from bogus talking points to Obama's determined effort to lie about the nature of the attacks as acts of war by state-sanctioned terrorists and Hillary Clinton's refusal to have the attackers found and punished - despite promising relatives of the dead that this would be done. Obama was wholly unprepared for the attack before it happened - and was even more unprepared for the attack after it happened. All they did was lie about it to justify doing nothing - and revealed their fundamental ethic by all but defending the attack with the lie that it was provoked by a video - all the more to avoid having to actually fight back against the enemy.
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Monday, May 13, 2013
Sinjar Records On Al Qaida In Iraq
Here is a lengthy analysis of Al Qaida documents on the group's activities in Iraq and Syria.
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Prepping For The All Star Race
NASCAR's regular season takes a breather this coming weekend, but the tour's participants don't, as they get ready for Charlotte's All Star Race weekend. The much-hyped weekend sees the All Star Showdown for cars that have not made the field for the All Star Race (2012 winners plus winners so far in 2013, which makes David Ragan eligible), and the top two of them makes the All Star field. The All Star Race has four 20-lap segments and a 10-lap shootout, with a $1 million bonus for winning all five segments.
A question that never gets asked anymore but which still is relevant to the sport - does the All Star Race really serve any worthwhile purpose for the sport? The 29 runnings of this race have gotten a lot of hype, yet the moments that tend to be cited in discussions of the race are always the crashes. As far as good racing, the All Star Race has come up short virtually every time. Only 1994 and 2000 produced battles that were actually good racing.
Given the reported attempt for Iowa Speedway to get a Cup date, one has to ask whether it's time to end "gimmick" races such as the All Star Race and the Clash at Daytona and instead spend the money used for adding another Cup race.
**********
The Southern 500 was an uncompetitive affair and yet another poor showing for the Generation Six racecar, and the postrace commentary showed the Gen-6 is going nowhere toward solving the sport's issue of aeropush - a contrast to the Kansas Truck 200 a month ago where dirty air helped create passing. It is also telling that we lately haven't seen much NASCAR hype of scoring loop data with regard to the Generation Six.
That the Southern 500 was run under the lights contrasts with the Winston 500 last week, which doesn't have lights, and with Indianapolis Motor Speedway to add lights for 2014 or 2015 with a $100 million state-backed upgrade. The rumor is thus already starting that Talladega will add lights down the road and we'll of course get griping that NASCAR should switch more races to night - never mind the complete lack of any improvement in the sport's ratings or popularity with night racing and the damage done to local tracks that are basically bullied out because NASCAR runs at night.
**********
An underrated issue remains the over-centralization of engine supply in NASCAR, with basically only four teams - Hendrick, RCR, Roush, and JGR building their own engines and other teams having to get their engines from them; even more curious is the seeming lack of outside engine shops such as the old Pro Motor Engineering or Mike Ege Racing Engines or Joey Arrington engine shops that once proliferated in the sport at the Cup level. The economics involved make sense to a point, yet also don't make sense in the larger picture of how much autonomy a team can have - one need recall Rick Hendrick's cryptic warning to Tony Stewart after he won the 2011 championship with Hendrick engines.
Racing writer Mike Mulhern has noted the absurdity of the issue with regard to NASCAR's recent clamp-down on Joe Gibbs and how outdated NASCAR's approach now seems to be.
**********
It is telling that while five teams teams have won so far in 2013 with credible efforts from Richard Petty Motorsports thrown in for good measure, Hendrick and Joe Gibbs have won all but three of the first eleven races. The biggest surprise of the season is not the Talladega win by Front Row Motorsports, not that that gigantic upset doesn't warrant continued attention.
The biggest surprise remains the collapse of Stewart Haas Racing, though even here the sense of shock is grossly tempered by the fact this scenario has been repeated. SHR's newest driver has a history not only of poor racing but of dragging down the organizations for which she races. To say Danica Patrick is a cancer in the garage of every team she races for is to be blunt about it. Her gender is her entitlement to race and her presence has a track record of collapsing everything around her.
RCR has just one win (with a presumed lame-duck driver in Kevin Harvick), and that fact plus the issue of engines of course tie in to the rumor of a brand switch for RCR sooner or later; if a rumored Dodge to RCR (with the resurgent Petty team as part of the package) switch happens it's definitely to the benefit of the sport, with potential improvement in its competitive depth an obvious example of benefit.
So it is right now entering Charlotte's two weeks of racing.
A question that never gets asked anymore but which still is relevant to the sport - does the All Star Race really serve any worthwhile purpose for the sport? The 29 runnings of this race have gotten a lot of hype, yet the moments that tend to be cited in discussions of the race are always the crashes. As far as good racing, the All Star Race has come up short virtually every time. Only 1994 and 2000 produced battles that were actually good racing.
Given the reported attempt for Iowa Speedway to get a Cup date, one has to ask whether it's time to end "gimmick" races such as the All Star Race and the Clash at Daytona and instead spend the money used for adding another Cup race.
**********
The Southern 500 was an uncompetitive affair and yet another poor showing for the Generation Six racecar, and the postrace commentary showed the Gen-6 is going nowhere toward solving the sport's issue of aeropush - a contrast to the Kansas Truck 200 a month ago where dirty air helped create passing. It is also telling that we lately haven't seen much NASCAR hype of scoring loop data with regard to the Generation Six.
That the Southern 500 was run under the lights contrasts with the Winston 500 last week, which doesn't have lights, and with Indianapolis Motor Speedway to add lights for 2014 or 2015 with a $100 million state-backed upgrade. The rumor is thus already starting that Talladega will add lights down the road and we'll of course get griping that NASCAR should switch more races to night - never mind the complete lack of any improvement in the sport's ratings or popularity with night racing and the damage done to local tracks that are basically bullied out because NASCAR runs at night.
**********
An underrated issue remains the over-centralization of engine supply in NASCAR, with basically only four teams - Hendrick, RCR, Roush, and JGR building their own engines and other teams having to get their engines from them; even more curious is the seeming lack of outside engine shops such as the old Pro Motor Engineering or Mike Ege Racing Engines or Joey Arrington engine shops that once proliferated in the sport at the Cup level. The economics involved make sense to a point, yet also don't make sense in the larger picture of how much autonomy a team can have - one need recall Rick Hendrick's cryptic warning to Tony Stewart after he won the 2011 championship with Hendrick engines.
Racing writer Mike Mulhern has noted the absurdity of the issue with regard to NASCAR's recent clamp-down on Joe Gibbs and how outdated NASCAR's approach now seems to be.
**********
It is telling that while five teams teams have won so far in 2013 with credible efforts from Richard Petty Motorsports thrown in for good measure, Hendrick and Joe Gibbs have won all but three of the first eleven races. The biggest surprise of the season is not the Talladega win by Front Row Motorsports, not that that gigantic upset doesn't warrant continued attention.
The biggest surprise remains the collapse of Stewart Haas Racing, though even here the sense of shock is grossly tempered by the fact this scenario has been repeated. SHR's newest driver has a history not only of poor racing but of dragging down the organizations for which she races. To say Danica Patrick is a cancer in the garage of every team she races for is to be blunt about it. Her gender is her entitlement to race and her presence has a track record of collapsing everything around her.
RCR has just one win (with a presumed lame-duck driver in Kevin Harvick), and that fact plus the issue of engines of course tie in to the rumor of a brand switch for RCR sooner or later; if a rumored Dodge to RCR (with the resurgent Petty team as part of the package) switch happens it's definitely to the benefit of the sport, with potential improvement in its competitive depth an obvious example of benefit.
So it is right now entering Charlotte's two weeks of racing.
Saturday, May 11, 2013
The Benghazi Scandal Grows
The Obama regime's rewrites of talking points points to greater dishonesty while the Obama regime touts an "investigation" that didn't particularly investigate. (See also here)
Thursday, May 09, 2013
NASCAR And Letting Go
Two recent decisions by the National Stock Car Racing Appeals Panel and the chief officer of appeals, ex-Pontiac honcho John Middlebrook, have been stunning defeats for NASCAR, involving reversals of severe penalties toward Penske Racing and Joe Gibbs Racing by NASCAR. The reversals have led to some speculation there is some sort of "open revolt" in NASCAR as Middlebrook has "consistently slapped NASCAR's enforcement hand when it comes to the penalties it assesses." In addition Middlebrook and NASCAR have worked seemingly at cross-purposes with each other; racecaster Dave Moody notes the fundamental difference between them - "Middlebrook is concerned primarily with fairness....NASCAR, meanwhile, is focused almost entirely on deterrence."
Writer Jim Utter wonders "How far (NASCAR) will go to maintain its control..." and it's a question worth asking. More to the point, the question is this - should NASCAR try to "maintain its control"? In other words, despite Mike Helton's insistence that NASCAR won't change, is it time for NASCAR to start letting go of some control?
In terms of what teams do or don't do to their racecars, the long-standing criticism is that NASCAR has too many rules. Of course that's always been the case, and usually when NASCAR tightens down on inspections it helps the competitive depth of the fields. There is also the crocodile tears angle - team cheating has always been ahead of the NASCAR inspectors (see Tom Jensen's book CHEATING: An Inside Look at the Bad Things Good NASCAR Winston Cup Racers Do In Pursuit Of Speed for the best summary of the history of this technology arms race between teams and the inspectors) and with the escalation of the overall technology arms race in the sport one shouldn't give Penske or JGR the automatic benefit of the doubt here.
But would there be benefit to the sport if NASCAR let go some of its control? For his part Helton said there is need for more specificity "so (we) can show a third party why we reacted the way we reacted." But beyond specificity in the rulebook, is there need to change the rulebook to allow more freedom of movement for teams?
There are some areas where the answer is manifestly yes, notably in terms of race operations. Talladega last week showcased two chronic absurdities allowed the officiating tower - racing to the stripe when a yellow flies, and not allowing passing below the yellow line on restrictor plate tracks. One has yet to see a credible argument against NASCAR giving up on policing those areas - certainly Regan Smith in 2008 and others before and after would benefit from eliminating any yellow line rule.
In terms of the racecars themselves the issue is more complex, for there doesn't seem much benefit to the overall sport by liberalizing some of the control wielded by the sanctioning body. If anything, Middlebrook and company's reversals of NASCAR penalties may have the effect of enabling more extensive - and more flagrant - cheating by teams that now see they can get away with it without much damage.
The rock and hard place gets illustrated here, for one can see where NASCAR is right but also where John Middlebrook is right.
Writer Jim Utter wonders "How far (NASCAR) will go to maintain its control..." and it's a question worth asking. More to the point, the question is this - should NASCAR try to "maintain its control"? In other words, despite Mike Helton's insistence that NASCAR won't change, is it time for NASCAR to start letting go of some control?
In terms of what teams do or don't do to their racecars, the long-standing criticism is that NASCAR has too many rules. Of course that's always been the case, and usually when NASCAR tightens down on inspections it helps the competitive depth of the fields. There is also the crocodile tears angle - team cheating has always been ahead of the NASCAR inspectors (see Tom Jensen's book CHEATING: An Inside Look at the Bad Things Good NASCAR Winston Cup Racers Do In Pursuit Of Speed for the best summary of the history of this technology arms race between teams and the inspectors) and with the escalation of the overall technology arms race in the sport one shouldn't give Penske or JGR the automatic benefit of the doubt here.
But would there be benefit to the sport if NASCAR let go some of its control? For his part Helton said there is need for more specificity "so (we) can show a third party why we reacted the way we reacted." But beyond specificity in the rulebook, is there need to change the rulebook to allow more freedom of movement for teams?
There are some areas where the answer is manifestly yes, notably in terms of race operations. Talladega last week showcased two chronic absurdities allowed the officiating tower - racing to the stripe when a yellow flies, and not allowing passing below the yellow line on restrictor plate tracks. One has yet to see a credible argument against NASCAR giving up on policing those areas - certainly Regan Smith in 2008 and others before and after would benefit from eliminating any yellow line rule.
In terms of the racecars themselves the issue is more complex, for there doesn't seem much benefit to the overall sport by liberalizing some of the control wielded by the sanctioning body. If anything, Middlebrook and company's reversals of NASCAR penalties may have the effect of enabling more extensive - and more flagrant - cheating by teams that now see they can get away with it without much damage.
The rock and hard place gets illustrated here, for one can see where NASCAR is right but also where John Middlebrook is right.
Wednesday, May 08, 2013
Iowa And Getting A Cup Race
The Iowa Speedway is a 3/4-mile oval identical to Richmond International Raceway, built by Rusty Wallace as such and later sold to the Clement family, owners of the Featherlite trailers company. The track has drawn Indycar races as well as NASCAR's Nationwide and Truck tours, the NASCAR East and West series, ARCA, and other smaller tours. The most competitive race in its history came in September 2006 involving the Pro Cup stock car series; in a green-white-checker finish Woody Howard fought off Daniel Johnson for the win after 11 yellows and 25 lead changes. In May 2007 a combination East-West 200-lapper was won by Joey Logano. But the most famous finish in the track's history came in 2011 when Ricky Stenhouse won despite blowing up and getting blasted in the back by Carl Edwards.
There has been some commentary advocating that Iowa Speedway be given at least one Winston Cup date. Commentary has become outright effort as Iowa legislators have included $8 million over four years to be spent on upgrades to the speedway in an effort to attract the Sprint Cup Series there. The bill hasn't passed the Iowa House as of yet, but state Senator William Dotzler is pretty spirited in advocating including Iowa on the Winston Cup tour.
Such advocacy of course isn't new - Rusty Wallace presumably had Cup in mind when he built the track. Yet when one considers adding Iowa to the Cup tour, the arguments for it really aren't that impressive.
Of the speedways in racing in general and NASCAR in particular, short tracks - contrary to the argument pushed by their advocates - have never been the best venues for stock car racing. At a local level they certainly work well such as for places like Thompson Speedway, Stafford Speedway, etc. At the Cup or even Nationwide and Truck level they create attention more for the wrong reasons (crashes) than the right ones (good racing). In NASCAR history when one examines the 50-plus most competitive races ever, the only short track race that makes the list is the 1991 Southeastern 500 at Bristol, a chaotic and competitive affair thanks to a one-race-only pitstop and restart procedure coming out of that season's aborted rule banning tire changes under yellow. The lead changed 41 times on double-file restarts and Rusty Wallace lost two laps on two occasions before making them up and beating Ernie Irvan by six feet.
Not that the short tracks otherwise haven't produced some memorable moments, but overall they just don't produce memorable racing, and this is inherent in their size and design. Even Richmond Raceway has had good moments but generally has not had great races even though it has ample room to race on.
The argument is often made that short tracks are less dependent on aero than bigger tracks, except this has never been true; there has never been a case of an aerodynamically inferior racecar winning short track races.
Adding Iowa to the Cup schedule also opens the debate about whether a track should lose a Cup date. Some of these tracks simply do not have markets that are all that stout, notably Martinsville - lack of a credible racing market is why the Rockingham track, despite commendable work by Andy Hillinberg, will not acquire Cup racing ever again barring an unlikely strengthening of that demographic. The Fontana track is often ripped for lack of a demographic, and it had two Cup dates but lost the date in September-October; the Atlanta and Darlington tracks already lost dates, and the way the sanctioning body has maneuvered the schedule it's gotten to where they really can't take a date away from a track - and speedway fratricide is never good for the sport.
There would of course be complaints if Iowa was added as an extra date, but at this point even with the decline in popularity of the sport, demand for it is such that NASCAR may have no choice but to add dates.
There is one other angle worth commentary because it deals with tracks such as Nashville and St. Louis that no longer race at all and further explains why Iowa wants a Cup date - NASCAR's TV rights package for Cup, which pays billions for Cup but reportedly pays little more than metaphorical pennies for any other series. The Nationwide Series is not broadcast by anyone except ESPN while the Trucks are limited to what is now SPEED Channel; why NASCAR doesn't invest more than it presently does into these series (or put them up for television bid) is baffling, since they can be more valuable competition properties if NASCAR would treat them as such as thus better deal with demand for racing. It should not have come to the point that the St. Louis and Nashville tracks had to close because of lack of Cup dates, especially after in 2010 the St. Louis track saw a spirited battle for the lead before the most vicious crash in NASCAR in awhile.
So Iowa will get advocacy for NASCAR to add it to the Cup schedule. But one should not blindly assume it deserves it.
There has been some commentary advocating that Iowa Speedway be given at least one Winston Cup date. Commentary has become outright effort as Iowa legislators have included $8 million over four years to be spent on upgrades to the speedway in an effort to attract the Sprint Cup Series there. The bill hasn't passed the Iowa House as of yet, but state Senator William Dotzler is pretty spirited in advocating including Iowa on the Winston Cup tour.
Such advocacy of course isn't new - Rusty Wallace presumably had Cup in mind when he built the track. Yet when one considers adding Iowa to the Cup tour, the arguments for it really aren't that impressive.
Of the speedways in racing in general and NASCAR in particular, short tracks - contrary to the argument pushed by their advocates - have never been the best venues for stock car racing. At a local level they certainly work well such as for places like Thompson Speedway, Stafford Speedway, etc. At the Cup or even Nationwide and Truck level they create attention more for the wrong reasons (crashes) than the right ones (good racing). In NASCAR history when one examines the 50-plus most competitive races ever, the only short track race that makes the list is the 1991 Southeastern 500 at Bristol, a chaotic and competitive affair thanks to a one-race-only pitstop and restart procedure coming out of that season's aborted rule banning tire changes under yellow. The lead changed 41 times on double-file restarts and Rusty Wallace lost two laps on two occasions before making them up and beating Ernie Irvan by six feet.
Not that the short tracks otherwise haven't produced some memorable moments, but overall they just don't produce memorable racing, and this is inherent in their size and design. Even Richmond Raceway has had good moments but generally has not had great races even though it has ample room to race on.
The argument is often made that short tracks are less dependent on aero than bigger tracks, except this has never been true; there has never been a case of an aerodynamically inferior racecar winning short track races.
Adding Iowa to the Cup schedule also opens the debate about whether a track should lose a Cup date. Some of these tracks simply do not have markets that are all that stout, notably Martinsville - lack of a credible racing market is why the Rockingham track, despite commendable work by Andy Hillinberg, will not acquire Cup racing ever again barring an unlikely strengthening of that demographic. The Fontana track is often ripped for lack of a demographic, and it had two Cup dates but lost the date in September-October; the Atlanta and Darlington tracks already lost dates, and the way the sanctioning body has maneuvered the schedule it's gotten to where they really can't take a date away from a track - and speedway fratricide is never good for the sport.
There would of course be complaints if Iowa was added as an extra date, but at this point even with the decline in popularity of the sport, demand for it is such that NASCAR may have no choice but to add dates.
There is one other angle worth commentary because it deals with tracks such as Nashville and St. Louis that no longer race at all and further explains why Iowa wants a Cup date - NASCAR's TV rights package for Cup, which pays billions for Cup but reportedly pays little more than metaphorical pennies for any other series. The Nationwide Series is not broadcast by anyone except ESPN while the Trucks are limited to what is now SPEED Channel; why NASCAR doesn't invest more than it presently does into these series (or put them up for television bid) is baffling, since they can be more valuable competition properties if NASCAR would treat them as such as thus better deal with demand for racing. It should not have come to the point that the St. Louis and Nashville tracks had to close because of lack of Cup dates, especially after in 2010 the St. Louis track saw a spirited battle for the lead before the most vicious crash in NASCAR in awhile.
So Iowa will get advocacy for NASCAR to add it to the Cup schedule. But one should not blindly assume it deserves it.
Romney On Marriage
Mitt Romney made some innocuous remarks about marriage that angered liberals because - natch - liberals think they know what in fact they don't.
Tuesday, May 07, 2013
Monday, May 06, 2013
The Upside Down Status Of NASCAR After Talladega
Suddenly the sport - for now - doesn't look the same.
The Winston 500 was not the most competitive race (it had just 30 lead changes), yet it produced the most amazing finish racing has seen in years, this following an Alabama 500k that almost was the most competitive race in the history of NASCAR's second-tier stock car tour (47 lead changes, just short of the all-time record 56 set in 2011's 312-miler) and topped by a three-abreast finish almost more astonishing than in the 500.
Talladega's Aarons Upsets are just part of a striking change in the sport so far, seen in the varied winners and losers of the weekend.
**********
WINNERS -
Front Row Motorsports for the biggest upset and most amazing racing finish in years. The team is a small outfit even though it is fielding three cars. What kind of competitive boost comes from this win remains to be seen, but to have gotten this far this fast suggests they can build something going forward; indeed Ford should be working to shore up the depth of its fleet by helping Front Row be able to build its own engines.
David Ragan specifically is also the winner not only of the race, but also the winner in terms of erasing a negative view of his racing career, as he drove Roush Fenway Racing's #6 and managed just one win (the 2011 Firecracker 400); being axed from RFR carried the stigma of career failure, a stigma wiped out in the Talladega rain.
Regan Smith is another big winner, as he was in contention for the Winston 500 and nearly pulled off the Talladega sweep. Suddenly upward mobility in modern NASCAR may not be extinct after all.
Historically one wouldn't consider Richard Petty's #43 any kind of darkhorse, but given where The King's car owning career has gone the last decade-plus the comeback of the #43 in 2013, notably Aric Almirola's victory bid at Talladega, this on top of Marcus Ambrose's two Watkins Glen wins, counts as the surge of a darkhorse; it also gives Petty ammo if/when Dodge comes back to the sport.
Roush Fenway Racing is also the winner, as it has taken the mantle of restrictor plate mastery from RCR and Hendrick as well as Joe Gibbs Racing.
The other winner is NASCAR the sanctioning body, this despite another example of a race marred because the officiating tower has too much control of the racing - the Alabama 500k was marred because NASCAR ruled Regan Smith the winner based on a scoring loop with the yellow flying instead of by the cars racing to the stripe. Even with that and the disappointing level of competition for most of the Winston 500, the shocking finish on Sunday combined with the exhilarating level of competition Saturday more than made up for shortcomings. Sunday also showed real competitive potential with the Generation Six - there was noticeable push-drafting on Sunday and it's no longer implausible to see the Firecracker 400 breaking 40 lead changes and October's Diehard 500 going for 60, and other darkhorses suddenly stealing thunder for the sport.
NASCAR also deserves praise for finishing the two races despite the persistent rain, though the inevitable calls for lighting at Talladega should be ignored given night racing has not been the benefit to the sport often claimed.
**********
But with winners there are also losers. Richard Childress, winner at Richmond and once the dominator of Talladega, had a very rough weekend and little to be happy with by the end of Sunday. Joe Gibbs Racing was also a loser despite Matt Kenseth's 142 laps led - the most at Talladega since Jeff Gordon in 2005. Earnhardt/Ganassi Racing isn't making anyone ignore the rumored sale of the outfit to John Menard. Penske Racing had a disappointing weekend. And Trevor Bayne - the comparisons with Tim Tebow work more than he'd like, because like Tebow Bayne has been MIA since 2011.
But the biggest loser is Stewart-Haas Racing, in a race that illustrates that Danica Patrick is doing again what she did in Indycars - dragging down the organization for which she races. SHR has struggled as an organization with Ryan Newman leading the way with four top ten finishes but a paltry 17th in points. Little Miss Danica is 27th in points and the surge from Daytona Speedweeks has gone the way of expectations after the 2005 Indianapolis 500. But the biggest surprise is Tony Stewart himself, with one top-ten finish.
That Newman is right now SHR's top dog is surprising given how much he has slid competitively even with three wins 2010-12 and amid the rumor he is on the way out to be replaced by Kevin Harvick in 2014. Newman's semi-petulant tantrum after the backstretch melee merely underscores that there is something wrong with how he races to be constantly involved in these crashes.
**********
And so we approach Darlington, site of Regan Smith's first official Cup win. In the upside down world of 2013 NASCAR, he may be the favorite.
The Winston 500 was not the most competitive race (it had just 30 lead changes), yet it produced the most amazing finish racing has seen in years, this following an Alabama 500k that almost was the most competitive race in the history of NASCAR's second-tier stock car tour (47 lead changes, just short of the all-time record 56 set in 2011's 312-miler) and topped by a three-abreast finish almost more astonishing than in the 500.
Talladega's Aarons Upsets are just part of a striking change in the sport so far, seen in the varied winners and losers of the weekend.
**********
WINNERS -
Front Row Motorsports for the biggest upset and most amazing racing finish in years. The team is a small outfit even though it is fielding three cars. What kind of competitive boost comes from this win remains to be seen, but to have gotten this far this fast suggests they can build something going forward; indeed Ford should be working to shore up the depth of its fleet by helping Front Row be able to build its own engines.
David Ragan specifically is also the winner not only of the race, but also the winner in terms of erasing a negative view of his racing career, as he drove Roush Fenway Racing's #6 and managed just one win (the 2011 Firecracker 400); being axed from RFR carried the stigma of career failure, a stigma wiped out in the Talladega rain.
Regan Smith is another big winner, as he was in contention for the Winston 500 and nearly pulled off the Talladega sweep. Suddenly upward mobility in modern NASCAR may not be extinct after all.
Historically one wouldn't consider Richard Petty's #43 any kind of darkhorse, but given where The King's car owning career has gone the last decade-plus the comeback of the #43 in 2013, notably Aric Almirola's victory bid at Talladega, this on top of Marcus Ambrose's two Watkins Glen wins, counts as the surge of a darkhorse; it also gives Petty ammo if/when Dodge comes back to the sport.
Roush Fenway Racing is also the winner, as it has taken the mantle of restrictor plate mastery from RCR and Hendrick as well as Joe Gibbs Racing.
The other winner is NASCAR the sanctioning body, this despite another example of a race marred because the officiating tower has too much control of the racing - the Alabama 500k was marred because NASCAR ruled Regan Smith the winner based on a scoring loop with the yellow flying instead of by the cars racing to the stripe. Even with that and the disappointing level of competition for most of the Winston 500, the shocking finish on Sunday combined with the exhilarating level of competition Saturday more than made up for shortcomings. Sunday also showed real competitive potential with the Generation Six - there was noticeable push-drafting on Sunday and it's no longer implausible to see the Firecracker 400 breaking 40 lead changes and October's Diehard 500 going for 60, and other darkhorses suddenly stealing thunder for the sport.
NASCAR also deserves praise for finishing the two races despite the persistent rain, though the inevitable calls for lighting at Talladega should be ignored given night racing has not been the benefit to the sport often claimed.
**********
But with winners there are also losers. Richard Childress, winner at Richmond and once the dominator of Talladega, had a very rough weekend and little to be happy with by the end of Sunday. Joe Gibbs Racing was also a loser despite Matt Kenseth's 142 laps led - the most at Talladega since Jeff Gordon in 2005. Earnhardt/Ganassi Racing isn't making anyone ignore the rumored sale of the outfit to John Menard. Penske Racing had a disappointing weekend. And Trevor Bayne - the comparisons with Tim Tebow work more than he'd like, because like Tebow Bayne has been MIA since 2011.
But the biggest loser is Stewart-Haas Racing, in a race that illustrates that Danica Patrick is doing again what she did in Indycars - dragging down the organization for which she races. SHR has struggled as an organization with Ryan Newman leading the way with four top ten finishes but a paltry 17th in points. Little Miss Danica is 27th in points and the surge from Daytona Speedweeks has gone the way of expectations after the 2005 Indianapolis 500. But the biggest surprise is Tony Stewart himself, with one top-ten finish.
That Newman is right now SHR's top dog is surprising given how much he has slid competitively even with three wins 2010-12 and amid the rumor he is on the way out to be replaced by Kevin Harvick in 2014. Newman's semi-petulant tantrum after the backstretch melee merely underscores that there is something wrong with how he races to be constantly involved in these crashes.
**********
And so we approach Darlington, site of Regan Smith's first official Cup win. In the upside down world of 2013 NASCAR, he may be the favorite.
Sunday, May 05, 2013
Talladega Sees A Ragan Revolution
We've seen it all before.
Yet when it happens again, it feels like we'd never seen anything like it before.
This is what we get when racing produces a darkhorse winner even at a speedway whose history is filled with them.
There were of course numerous candidates for darkhorse winner, even after one of them flipped over down the backstretch. Kurt Busch's tumble set up a green-white-checker finish and then saw what seemed impossible - the Saturday Alabama 500k produced a finish seemingly impossible to top - yet the Winston 500 actually topped Saturday's three-wide photo finish, and reintroduced the sport not only to David Ragan - the winner in the 2009 500k - but reintroduced the sport to the Talladega jinx.
Of all the tracks in racing, one cannot think of any other that has seen as many darkhorse winners as Talladega. From the 1969 opening marred by a mass driver park-out over speeds too high for available tires to handle, Talladega has been the stage for the darkhorse. Richard Brickhouse was the first. James Hylton in 1972 after a new Goodyear compound literally blew up in Goodyear's face was the second, going with year-old tires and rocketing from 22nd to domination. Dick Brooks 40 years ago this season was the next one, whipping a year-old Plymouth from 24th to a wild upset win.
Dave Marcis outlasted another ferocious 500 in 1976 for his lone Talladega win. Lennie Pond in 1978 then whipped to his only win. The most famous upset of all remains Ron Bouchard in 1981 in a finish that always comes to mind when there is a three-wide photo finish, be it Regan Smith's win in Saturday's 312-miler or Tim Richmond's 1986 Pocono win or Sam Hornish's 2003 Chicago Indy 300 win.
After Bobby Hillin Jr., Davey Allison, and Ken Schrader in Richmond's #25 won Talladega, the darkhorse era at Talladega appeared to end in the 1990s as only Greg Sacks in the 1996 Alabama 500k pulled off an upset for the track in that decade. The darkhorse era then started creeping back in 2006 with Brian Vickers; Regan Smith's stolen 2008 win pushed the darkhorse era closer to the fore, but it was 2009 that truly brought it back between Brad Keselowski's slugfest with Carl Edwards and then Jamie McMurray's surprise win that autumn.
**********
This spectacular win has also reintroduced the sport to new team owners getting the win. Front Row Motorsports began with Jimmy Means and restaurant chain owner Bob Jenkins (not the Bob Jenkins of ESPN fame). Being small has of course been a strike against them, and with the win, being small is also an illustration of how much opportunity Talladega Superspeedway opens up for racers.
The Jenkins team was not the only darkhorse outfit strutting its stuff in this race, as James Finch's team with Regan Smith (who had a legitimate shot at the end for the Talladega sweep) as well as the Baldwin Racing #36 were also in contention with the #30 of David Stremme. No one will ever confuse the #43 for a darkhorse but Richard Petty's mount damn near pulled off the win as well. No one will ever confuse Jeff Gordon's #24 for a darkhorse either, yet after two wrecks Gordon finished 11th anyway.
**********
Given how much positivity the 2013 Winston 500 produced, it seems inappropriate to pick nits, yet one should point out this race was not quite the ringing endorsement of the Generation Six racecar the spectacle of the final laps showcased. The racing at the end was spectacular, and one wishes the combat up front had been at something close to that level for the event's duration as was the case in the 312-miler the day before - after seeing 47 lead changes on Saturday, the 30 produced Sunday ought to have been twice that number.
The other nit to pick is Ryan Newman, who continues to be an insufferable baby; one should be concerned that Kurt Busch flipped onto his racecar, but to blame it on NASCAR is another case of Newman going too far. Newman is 100% wrong; restarting the race was the right call; he should be angry at whoever spun out whomever to detonate the crash; Newman should also reexamine his own racing competence given how far he's slid down the racing totem pole.
The upshot is that pointing out the nits to pick only illustrates that the Gen-6 actually is making progress toward living up to the hype. There was some serious push-drafting at the end and that's a manifestly good sign for the sport, for that opens up passing - and the sport needs all the passing there is to have.
So the Aarons Talladega weekend after two drawn-out races can only be considered a smashing success, which produces yet one more illustration - The Thrill Isn't Gone after all.
Yet when it happens again, it feels like we'd never seen anything like it before.
This is what we get when racing produces a darkhorse winner even at a speedway whose history is filled with them.
There were of course numerous candidates for darkhorse winner, even after one of them flipped over down the backstretch. Kurt Busch's tumble set up a green-white-checker finish and then saw what seemed impossible - the Saturday Alabama 500k produced a finish seemingly impossible to top - yet the Winston 500 actually topped Saturday's three-wide photo finish, and reintroduced the sport not only to David Ragan - the winner in the 2009 500k - but reintroduced the sport to the Talladega jinx.
Of all the tracks in racing, one cannot think of any other that has seen as many darkhorse winners as Talladega. From the 1969 opening marred by a mass driver park-out over speeds too high for available tires to handle, Talladega has been the stage for the darkhorse. Richard Brickhouse was the first. James Hylton in 1972 after a new Goodyear compound literally blew up in Goodyear's face was the second, going with year-old tires and rocketing from 22nd to domination. Dick Brooks 40 years ago this season was the next one, whipping a year-old Plymouth from 24th to a wild upset win.
Dave Marcis outlasted another ferocious 500 in 1976 for his lone Talladega win. Lennie Pond in 1978 then whipped to his only win. The most famous upset of all remains Ron Bouchard in 1981 in a finish that always comes to mind when there is a three-wide photo finish, be it Regan Smith's win in Saturday's 312-miler or Tim Richmond's 1986 Pocono win or Sam Hornish's 2003 Chicago Indy 300 win.
After Bobby Hillin Jr., Davey Allison, and Ken Schrader in Richmond's #25 won Talladega, the darkhorse era at Talladega appeared to end in the 1990s as only Greg Sacks in the 1996 Alabama 500k pulled off an upset for the track in that decade. The darkhorse era then started creeping back in 2006 with Brian Vickers; Regan Smith's stolen 2008 win pushed the darkhorse era closer to the fore, but it was 2009 that truly brought it back between Brad Keselowski's slugfest with Carl Edwards and then Jamie McMurray's surprise win that autumn.
**********
This spectacular win has also reintroduced the sport to new team owners getting the win. Front Row Motorsports began with Jimmy Means and restaurant chain owner Bob Jenkins (not the Bob Jenkins of ESPN fame). Being small has of course been a strike against them, and with the win, being small is also an illustration of how much opportunity Talladega Superspeedway opens up for racers.
The Jenkins team was not the only darkhorse outfit strutting its stuff in this race, as James Finch's team with Regan Smith (who had a legitimate shot at the end for the Talladega sweep) as well as the Baldwin Racing #36 were also in contention with the #30 of David Stremme. No one will ever confuse the #43 for a darkhorse but Richard Petty's mount damn near pulled off the win as well. No one will ever confuse Jeff Gordon's #24 for a darkhorse either, yet after two wrecks Gordon finished 11th anyway.
**********
Given how much positivity the 2013 Winston 500 produced, it seems inappropriate to pick nits, yet one should point out this race was not quite the ringing endorsement of the Generation Six racecar the spectacle of the final laps showcased. The racing at the end was spectacular, and one wishes the combat up front had been at something close to that level for the event's duration as was the case in the 312-miler the day before - after seeing 47 lead changes on Saturday, the 30 produced Sunday ought to have been twice that number.
The other nit to pick is Ryan Newman, who continues to be an insufferable baby; one should be concerned that Kurt Busch flipped onto his racecar, but to blame it on NASCAR is another case of Newman going too far. Newman is 100% wrong; restarting the race was the right call; he should be angry at whoever spun out whomever to detonate the crash; Newman should also reexamine his own racing competence given how far he's slid down the racing totem pole.
The upshot is that pointing out the nits to pick only illustrates that the Gen-6 actually is making progress toward living up to the hype. There was some serious push-drafting at the end and that's a manifestly good sign for the sport, for that opens up passing - and the sport needs all the passing there is to have.
So the Aarons Talladega weekend after two drawn-out races can only be considered a smashing success, which produces yet one more illustration - The Thrill Isn't Gone after all.
Regan Smith And NASCAR's Comeuppance
NASCAR's 2013 Aarons Talladega weekend got off to a nasty start with rain galore and delay of the Alabama 500k race - aka The Aarons 312 - by some three hours. The wait turned out to be worth it as far as mind-blowing racing goes. It was also worth it for NASCAR getting some much-deserved comeuppance.
The race was cut short by seven laps because of impending darkness, and it turned into an amazing thirteen car shootout and a three-abreast finish that should have been a photo finish - except the initial ruling of Kasey Kahne as the winner was reversed by NASCAR based on freezing the field when the caution comes out instead of racing to the flag. NASCAR ruled Regan Smith was ahead of Kahne based on a scoring loop as the yellow flew, so Smith was declared the winner.
Regan Smith being involved in controversy over a win at Talladega - the irony is delicious, because this time Smith is the one benefitting from a NASCAR rule that objectively speaking has no business existing. NASCAR stopped allowing cars to race to the line after the 2003 New Hampshire 300 because of foolish driving by Michael Waltrip amid a crash involving Dale Jarret. NASCAR had had similar incidents before - such as involving Geoff Bodine at the 1989 Summer 500 at Pocono amid a crash involving Bobby Hillin Jr. - and dealt with them sensibly without changing the rule. The objective reality is the finish ought to be determined at the start-finish line, not by a scoring loop when the yellow comes out. Several races have seen the wrong winner declared because of not allowing racing to the stripe when the yellow comes out - the infamous 2004 Winston 500 won by Jeff Gordon, the 2005 Diehard 500 won by Dale Jarrett, the 2006 Diehard 500 won by Brian Vickers, and the 2008 Firecracker 400 won by Kyle Busch come immediately to mind - and then there are the races where a crash happened and the yellow DIDN'T fly, in effect allowing the field to race to the line - the 2004 Firecracker 250 won by Mike Wallace and the 2007 Daytona 500 won by Kevin Harvick come to mind.
What NASCAR thinks it is preventing by not allowing racing to the stripe, especially in situations such as listed above, does not come across as valid. Freezing the field is not preventing any crash; all it is doing is creating controversy that should not even exist. That Regan Smith is the beneficiary here is the comeuppance for NASCAR for the 2008 Diehard 500 - Regan Smith drafted past Tony Stewart to the stripe, but NASCAR disqualified the pass because Smith went below the yellow line - a rule dating to Jimmy Spencer's petulant bitch-fest at the 2001 Alabama 500k. To that point passing below the yellow line had never been an issue to the racers; suddenly NASCAR now had controversies based on giving the officiating tower more element of control over the racing - it blew up with Dale Earnhardt Jr's 2003 Talladega win where he passed on the apron of Turn Three; there have been other incidents of passing below the yellow line - some like Tony Stewart at the end of the 2003 Diehard 500 went unnoticed; others have resulted in NASCAR penalties - none bigger than Regan Smith in 2008.
The fact is NASCAR was wrong in 2008 - there is no objective legitimacy to the rule against passing below the yellow line; making it more devastating was a quote attributed to Ramsey Poston of NASCAR claiming that the yellow line rule did not apply to last-lap passes. So five years later another rule that has no place in the sport - freezing the field instead of racing to the line when the yellow flies - winds up in effect making up for the wrong rule (and ruling) of 2008.
**********
The rain and the controvery merely added to the exhilaration of another amazing Talladega Busch/Nationwide race. Because NASCAR's rules czars have largely left the N'wide cars alone for the plate tracks, the tandem draft is extremely effective and it showed in 47 lead changes among 16 drivers, not a record for NASCAR's second-tier stock car tour (2011's 56 lead changes is the record) but darned close and an awesome number even for a 500 MILE race.
The race showcased not only superb competition from Smith and Kahne, it also showed strong efforts by cars wiped out in the plethora of wrecks - notably Reed Sorenson and Travis Pastrana after a tag from Brian Scott while racing with the leaders. And there was also another Danica crash.
It's regrettable rain plagued the weekend this way, but when the sport produces racing this ferocious and this competitive, it's all worth it.
It also proves that sometimes what goes around does come around.
Regan Smith being involved in controversy over a win at Talladega - the irony is delicious, because this time Smith is the one benefitting from a NASCAR rule that objectively speaking has no business existing. NASCAR stopped allowing cars to race to the line after the 2003 New Hampshire 300 because of foolish driving by Michael Waltrip amid a crash involving Dale Jarret. NASCAR had had similar incidents before - such as involving Geoff Bodine at the 1989 Summer 500 at Pocono amid a crash involving Bobby Hillin Jr. - and dealt with them sensibly without changing the rule. The objective reality is the finish ought to be determined at the start-finish line, not by a scoring loop when the yellow comes out. Several races have seen the wrong winner declared because of not allowing racing to the stripe when the yellow comes out - the infamous 2004 Winston 500 won by Jeff Gordon, the 2005 Diehard 500 won by Dale Jarrett, the 2006 Diehard 500 won by Brian Vickers, and the 2008 Firecracker 400 won by Kyle Busch come immediately to mind - and then there are the races where a crash happened and the yellow DIDN'T fly, in effect allowing the field to race to the line - the 2004 Firecracker 250 won by Mike Wallace and the 2007 Daytona 500 won by Kevin Harvick come to mind.
What NASCAR thinks it is preventing by not allowing racing to the stripe, especially in situations such as listed above, does not come across as valid. Freezing the field is not preventing any crash; all it is doing is creating controversy that should not even exist. That Regan Smith is the beneficiary here is the comeuppance for NASCAR for the 2008 Diehard 500 - Regan Smith drafted past Tony Stewart to the stripe, but NASCAR disqualified the pass because Smith went below the yellow line - a rule dating to Jimmy Spencer's petulant bitch-fest at the 2001 Alabama 500k. To that point passing below the yellow line had never been an issue to the racers; suddenly NASCAR now had controversies based on giving the officiating tower more element of control over the racing - it blew up with Dale Earnhardt Jr's 2003 Talladega win where he passed on the apron of Turn Three; there have been other incidents of passing below the yellow line - some like Tony Stewart at the end of the 2003 Diehard 500 went unnoticed; others have resulted in NASCAR penalties - none bigger than Regan Smith in 2008.
The fact is NASCAR was wrong in 2008 - there is no objective legitimacy to the rule against passing below the yellow line; making it more devastating was a quote attributed to Ramsey Poston of NASCAR claiming that the yellow line rule did not apply to last-lap passes. So five years later another rule that has no place in the sport - freezing the field instead of racing to the line when the yellow flies - winds up in effect making up for the wrong rule (and ruling) of 2008.
**********
The rain and the controvery merely added to the exhilaration of another amazing Talladega Busch/Nationwide race. Because NASCAR's rules czars have largely left the N'wide cars alone for the plate tracks, the tandem draft is extremely effective and it showed in 47 lead changes among 16 drivers, not a record for NASCAR's second-tier stock car tour (2011's 56 lead changes is the record) but darned close and an awesome number even for a 500 MILE race.
The race showcased not only superb competition from Smith and Kahne, it also showed strong efforts by cars wiped out in the plethora of wrecks - notably Reed Sorenson and Travis Pastrana after a tag from Brian Scott while racing with the leaders. And there was also another Danica crash.
It's regrettable rain plagued the weekend this way, but when the sport produces racing this ferocious and this competitive, it's all worth it.
It also proves that sometimes what goes around does come around.
Friday, May 03, 2013
Thursday, May 02, 2013
The Forgotten Flow Of Integration
Barry Goldwater's role in integration has long been forgotten - and it should not, for it illustrates how market forces create real social change.
Hillary's Benghazi Cover-Up
The Hillary Milhous Clinton campaign to hide the Benghazi disaster is coming undone as messages sent by her are uncovered.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Monday, April 29, 2013
Obama's Growing Terrorist Problem
Obama's poor response to the Patriots Day bombing is illustrative of his fundamental inability to see Islamo-Arab imperialism for what it is - a state-sanctioned ideology of pure hatred. Islamist ideology requires killing non-believers everywhere, and killing is the driving ideology of states like Iran and Syria and of Saddam Hussein's Iraq (contrary to the myth that Iraq supposedly was enemies with Islamists).
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Santos Puts The Spring In The Spring Sizzler
Sometimes it's all about one guy.
Stafford Speedway opened its season at the end of April, and the Spring in Spring Sizzler was redefined with stunningly good weather on Sunday. The Whelen Modified Tour was the big show of a Sunday feast of racing that began with Stafford's SK Modifieds, a 40-lap feature that compressed a plethora of yellows and some good battling up front into the first 20 circuits before Ryan Preece put it away in the final 20 laps. Mod Tour veteran Mike Stefanik had not driven a Stafford SK since 1993 yet was pressed into a relief role as track regular Keith Rocco was nursing a wrist injury.
The SK feature was the warmup for several drivers competing in the Sizzler 200-lapper, notably Preece, Ted Christopher, Woody Pitkat, Rowan Pennick, and Stefanik. SK veteran Todd Szegedy was on the Tour feature's front row alongside pole-sitter Bobby Santos III. A native of Franklin, MA, Santos' youthful quality makes one forget he's been a Tour regular since 2004 and has also raced in the Nationwide Series, notably last July at Daytona in Tommy Baldwin Jr's Chevrolet; he also raced Daytona's February 300-miler in Jimmy Means' car in 2011.
His attempts at the big leagues so far haven't borne fruit, and he's car-hopped in the Mod Tour with such teams as Joe Brady, Boehler Racing, Bob Garbarino, his own cars, and lately Sully Tinio's #44. It's illustrutive of the general sense of neglect by NASCAR toward the Modified Tour that Santos won twice in 2012 yet had to miss five of fourteen races. But there's reason for optimism for Santos right now, as he cleaned house at the Sizzler by leading 197 of 200 laps and was never threatened at any point of the race, even with several late yellows (including a brief red flag for a Lap 150 melee involving Bryon Chew, Ken Heagy, Ronnie Silk, and Gary McDonald) and the likes of Ryan Preece, Christopher, Pennick, and Justin Bonsignore making spirited efforts into the front five.
That Teddy was even in contention was surprising, as his Boehler #3 never seemed hooked up and he spent a long time outside the top ten; he managed to get into the top seven and then nearly got waylaid with fifteen to go in a three-wide slugfest ending in a four-car crash and Szegedy's elimination from the race after a frustrating day.
In the end Teddy and Bonsignore, like everyone else, had nothing for Santos. The win is Santos' third in the last four Modified Tour races, and it showed that sometimes it's all about one guy - it was certainly about Santos at Stafford's Spring Sizzler in 2013.
Stafford Speedway opened its season at the end of April, and the Spring in Spring Sizzler was redefined with stunningly good weather on Sunday. The Whelen Modified Tour was the big show of a Sunday feast of racing that began with Stafford's SK Modifieds, a 40-lap feature that compressed a plethora of yellows and some good battling up front into the first 20 circuits before Ryan Preece put it away in the final 20 laps. Mod Tour veteran Mike Stefanik had not driven a Stafford SK since 1993 yet was pressed into a relief role as track regular Keith Rocco was nursing a wrist injury.
The SK feature was the warmup for several drivers competing in the Sizzler 200-lapper, notably Preece, Ted Christopher, Woody Pitkat, Rowan Pennick, and Stefanik. SK veteran Todd Szegedy was on the Tour feature's front row alongside pole-sitter Bobby Santos III. A native of Franklin, MA, Santos' youthful quality makes one forget he's been a Tour regular since 2004 and has also raced in the Nationwide Series, notably last July at Daytona in Tommy Baldwin Jr's Chevrolet; he also raced Daytona's February 300-miler in Jimmy Means' car in 2011.
His attempts at the big leagues so far haven't borne fruit, and he's car-hopped in the Mod Tour with such teams as Joe Brady, Boehler Racing, Bob Garbarino, his own cars, and lately Sully Tinio's #44. It's illustrutive of the general sense of neglect by NASCAR toward the Modified Tour that Santos won twice in 2012 yet had to miss five of fourteen races. But there's reason for optimism for Santos right now, as he cleaned house at the Sizzler by leading 197 of 200 laps and was never threatened at any point of the race, even with several late yellows (including a brief red flag for a Lap 150 melee involving Bryon Chew, Ken Heagy, Ronnie Silk, and Gary McDonald) and the likes of Ryan Preece, Christopher, Pennick, and Justin Bonsignore making spirited efforts into the front five.
That Teddy was even in contention was surprising, as his Boehler #3 never seemed hooked up and he spent a long time outside the top ten; he managed to get into the top seven and then nearly got waylaid with fifteen to go in a three-wide slugfest ending in a four-car crash and Szegedy's elimination from the race after a frustrating day.
In the end Teddy and Bonsignore, like everyone else, had nothing for Santos. The win is Santos' third in the last four Modified Tour races, and it showed that sometimes it's all about one guy - it was certainly about Santos at Stafford's Spring Sizzler in 2013.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Friday, April 26, 2013
Thursday, April 25, 2013
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Boston Bombers - Homegrown, Foreign, or Both?
International connections to the Patriots Day bombers need to be investigated. It seems obvious the bombers and their allies didn't do this out of being Chechens.
2012 Regulatory Rules Outrace Everyone Else
Report: 2012 Regulatory Rules More Costly than All Rules in 'Entire First Terms of Presidents Bush and Clinton, Combined' - yet another sign that government meddling in the economy doesn't work.
Sizing Up Cup In Mid-April
With Kansas done the Cup series hits Richmond for a Saturday night bash before the Winston 500 at Talladega. A look at drivers, their teams, and how they're doing entering Richmond -
**********
HENDRICK MOTORSPORTS - We start with point leader Jimmie Johnson, as there isn't much to say given his two wins and having just two finishes lower than sixth so far. His teammate Kasey Kahne got off to a very slow start but has posted a win and two runner-ups since February.
Faltering right now is - as usual - Dale Earnhardt Jr., who has looked bad the last three races, fulfilling the pattern that has defined his career since the end of 2004. Curiously also faltering is the old man at Hendrick (and when was the last time that could be said?), Jeff Gordon, who has led laps as is custom but hasn't cashed in on anything. One may have to start wondering about Gordon this season.
**********
PENSKE RACING - Switching to Ford isn't what's hurting this outfit; what's hurting is their new hire - Joey Logano. Despite two top fives Logano has showcased his dangerous driving as well as propensity to crash between the brawl at Fontana and now the bad crash at Kansas, which elicited a Twitter-published epistle of outright hate from Denny Hamlin that is simultaneously surprising yet to be expected in modern NASCAR. Such a semi-anonymous attack on another driver is indicative of the hatred that exists against Logano, a hatred brought about by his years of immaturity and the often-mind-blowing brainlessness of his racing. It's also in its own way refreshing, for if nothing else it is brutally honest - something sorely missing in society.
Brad Keselowski's solid finishes have been overshadowed of late by NASCAR's public punishment of the Penske organization at Texas as well as the continuing controversy over Brian France's overall handling of the defending series champion.
**********
ROUSH-FENWAY RACING -The good news is Greg Biffle and Carl Edwards are solidly in the top ten in points. The bad news is despite Edwards' Phoenix win there seems to be little momentum going for the organization; Edwards hadn't led a lap after Phoenix until Kansas, while Biffle hasn't led since Phoenix and has pretty much been all over the map as far as the racing goes. Rookie Ricky Stenhouse, while not running poorly, nonetheless looks like a typical rookie and his romantic relationship with Danica Patrick is no help career-wise.
**********
JOE GIBBS RACING - It says volumes about the absurdity of NASCAR's whole philosophy on points systems that Kyle Busch and Matt Kenseth have won four of the first eight races and have combined for 917 laps led, yet are realistically in no contention for the title. The #11 car has suffered with Denny Hamlin's injury, yet it also bears mentioning that Hamlin wasn't setting anything on fire before that wreck - his Fontana victory bid and the 117 laps led at Bristol were by far his best efforts in the 2013 season. When he comes back one wonders whether he'll bring the same ferocity.
**********
MICHAEL WALTRIP RACING - Clint Bowyer continues to carry the organization despite leading exactly one lap (this coming at Daytona) in the first eight races. His finishes have been all over the map so far but he's accounted for three of MWR's six top fives so far. Martin Truex has been surging lately, leading 188 laps in the last two races, but we've seen such spurts from him before with nothing coming of it. Mark Martin has run decently in MWR's #55.
**********
RCR ENTERPRISES - Amid the Dodge rumor that isn't going away, RCR's points positions are actually better than their cars have looked. Paul Menard remains tenth in points while lame-duck Kevin Harvick is twelfth, but it says a lot about how far the RCR fleet has fallen than Menard has four of the fleet's six top ten finishes so far yet has nothing better than a pair of ninths to show for it and has accounted for the only lap led so far by RCR cars. Jeff Burton meanwhile appears at the end of the line, 23rd in points and displaying zero firepower anywhere.
**********
EARNHARDT-GANASSI RACING - There's definitely something to the story that John Menard will buy out Ganassi; it's showing in how mediocre this organization is. Juan Montoya has been pretty much a NASCAR drafting bust while Jamie McMurray has been decent so far this year, posting three top tens. Yet even with that the Ganassi cars don't look like there's anything left for them, and given the exodus of car owners from the sport the last few years one should keep an eye on the Menard story.
**********
RICHARD PETTY MOTORSPORTS - A subplot of the RCR-to-Dodge rumor is that Petty would be part of the package, becoming a satellite outfit for RCR. Given the surge of the Petty team of recent, if Dodge comes back they'll get a good package reuniting with The King. Aric Almirola has been coming on so far, posting back-to-back top tens and showing respectable muscle every week in Petty's #43.
If the Dodge rumor comes true one wonders what would then become of Ford stalwart Marcos Ambrose, who's won the last two Watkins Glen grands prix yet so far in 2013 hasn't been that hot outside of eighth at Martinsville. Regardless, right now Petty Motorsports is a team on the rise.
**********
STEWART-HAAS RACING - Are they regretting hiring Danica Patrick yet?
The pattern she showed in Indycars is repeating itself in NASCAR - she drags down every organization that takes a chance on her. The pole at Daytona and a surprising Martinsville effort can't hide the poor performances everywhere else, and it's dragged down the rest of the Stewart-Haas fleet. Ryan Newman has four of the group's six top tens and its only top five, and it says a lot about Newman that this is the team's best effort. Newman's career has never recovered from the Rusty Wallace-led rules blitz in reaction to Newman's 2003 victory surge, and his career continues to flounder amid the real possibility he will be the odd man out once Kevin Harvick arrives.
Team co-owner Stewart was shockingly successful his first four seasons as an owner-driver, but now it's obvious he's in over his head just like other owner-drivers have been. One wonders when the shoe will drop here.
**********
BARNEY VISSER - The sport's only notable one-car effort employs Kurt Busch and Busch has grabbed a pair of top-five finishes, surprisingly stout but inevitably the apex for a season that looks to already be on its downward spiral. The rumor that Busch will take over one of the RCR cars is out there as well.
**********
THE REST OF THE FIELD - Brad Daugherty's team plugs along with Bobby Labonte, but outside of 15th at Daytona there really isn't much here. James Finch's #51 has a seventh at Daytona with Regan Smith and that's it. Germain Racing and Tommy Baldwin's team aren't going anywhere, either.
**********
So there we are eight races into the 2013 season, with Richmond and Talladega beckoning.
**********
HENDRICK MOTORSPORTS - We start with point leader Jimmie Johnson, as there isn't much to say given his two wins and having just two finishes lower than sixth so far. His teammate Kasey Kahne got off to a very slow start but has posted a win and two runner-ups since February.
Faltering right now is - as usual - Dale Earnhardt Jr., who has looked bad the last three races, fulfilling the pattern that has defined his career since the end of 2004. Curiously also faltering is the old man at Hendrick (and when was the last time that could be said?), Jeff Gordon, who has led laps as is custom but hasn't cashed in on anything. One may have to start wondering about Gordon this season.
**********
PENSKE RACING - Switching to Ford isn't what's hurting this outfit; what's hurting is their new hire - Joey Logano. Despite two top fives Logano has showcased his dangerous driving as well as propensity to crash between the brawl at Fontana and now the bad crash at Kansas, which elicited a Twitter-published epistle of outright hate from Denny Hamlin that is simultaneously surprising yet to be expected in modern NASCAR. Such a semi-anonymous attack on another driver is indicative of the hatred that exists against Logano, a hatred brought about by his years of immaturity and the often-mind-blowing brainlessness of his racing. It's also in its own way refreshing, for if nothing else it is brutally honest - something sorely missing in society.
Brad Keselowski's solid finishes have been overshadowed of late by NASCAR's public punishment of the Penske organization at Texas as well as the continuing controversy over Brian France's overall handling of the defending series champion.
**********
ROUSH-FENWAY RACING -The good news is Greg Biffle and Carl Edwards are solidly in the top ten in points. The bad news is despite Edwards' Phoenix win there seems to be little momentum going for the organization; Edwards hadn't led a lap after Phoenix until Kansas, while Biffle hasn't led since Phoenix and has pretty much been all over the map as far as the racing goes. Rookie Ricky Stenhouse, while not running poorly, nonetheless looks like a typical rookie and his romantic relationship with Danica Patrick is no help career-wise.
**********
JOE GIBBS RACING - It says volumes about the absurdity of NASCAR's whole philosophy on points systems that Kyle Busch and Matt Kenseth have won four of the first eight races and have combined for 917 laps led, yet are realistically in no contention for the title. The #11 car has suffered with Denny Hamlin's injury, yet it also bears mentioning that Hamlin wasn't setting anything on fire before that wreck - his Fontana victory bid and the 117 laps led at Bristol were by far his best efforts in the 2013 season. When he comes back one wonders whether he'll bring the same ferocity.
**********
MICHAEL WALTRIP RACING - Clint Bowyer continues to carry the organization despite leading exactly one lap (this coming at Daytona) in the first eight races. His finishes have been all over the map so far but he's accounted for three of MWR's six top fives so far. Martin Truex has been surging lately, leading 188 laps in the last two races, but we've seen such spurts from him before with nothing coming of it. Mark Martin has run decently in MWR's #55.
**********
RCR ENTERPRISES - Amid the Dodge rumor that isn't going away, RCR's points positions are actually better than their cars have looked. Paul Menard remains tenth in points while lame-duck Kevin Harvick is twelfth, but it says a lot about how far the RCR fleet has fallen than Menard has four of the fleet's six top ten finishes so far yet has nothing better than a pair of ninths to show for it and has accounted for the only lap led so far by RCR cars. Jeff Burton meanwhile appears at the end of the line, 23rd in points and displaying zero firepower anywhere.
**********
EARNHARDT-GANASSI RACING - There's definitely something to the story that John Menard will buy out Ganassi; it's showing in how mediocre this organization is. Juan Montoya has been pretty much a NASCAR drafting bust while Jamie McMurray has been decent so far this year, posting three top tens. Yet even with that the Ganassi cars don't look like there's anything left for them, and given the exodus of car owners from the sport the last few years one should keep an eye on the Menard story.
**********
RICHARD PETTY MOTORSPORTS - A subplot of the RCR-to-Dodge rumor is that Petty would be part of the package, becoming a satellite outfit for RCR. Given the surge of the Petty team of recent, if Dodge comes back they'll get a good package reuniting with The King. Aric Almirola has been coming on so far, posting back-to-back top tens and showing respectable muscle every week in Petty's #43.
If the Dodge rumor comes true one wonders what would then become of Ford stalwart Marcos Ambrose, who's won the last two Watkins Glen grands prix yet so far in 2013 hasn't been that hot outside of eighth at Martinsville. Regardless, right now Petty Motorsports is a team on the rise.
**********
STEWART-HAAS RACING - Are they regretting hiring Danica Patrick yet?
The pattern she showed in Indycars is repeating itself in NASCAR - she drags down every organization that takes a chance on her. The pole at Daytona and a surprising Martinsville effort can't hide the poor performances everywhere else, and it's dragged down the rest of the Stewart-Haas fleet. Ryan Newman has four of the group's six top tens and its only top five, and it says a lot about Newman that this is the team's best effort. Newman's career has never recovered from the Rusty Wallace-led rules blitz in reaction to Newman's 2003 victory surge, and his career continues to flounder amid the real possibility he will be the odd man out once Kevin Harvick arrives.
Team co-owner Stewart was shockingly successful his first four seasons as an owner-driver, but now it's obvious he's in over his head just like other owner-drivers have been. One wonders when the shoe will drop here.
**********
BARNEY VISSER - The sport's only notable one-car effort employs Kurt Busch and Busch has grabbed a pair of top-five finishes, surprisingly stout but inevitably the apex for a season that looks to already be on its downward spiral. The rumor that Busch will take over one of the RCR cars is out there as well.
**********
THE REST OF THE FIELD - Brad Daugherty's team plugs along with Bobby Labonte, but outside of 15th at Daytona there really isn't much here. James Finch's #51 has a seventh at Daytona with Regan Smith and that's it. Germain Racing and Tommy Baldwin's team aren't going anywhere, either.
**********
So there we are eight races into the 2013 season, with Richmond and Talladega beckoning.
Monday, April 22, 2013
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Kansas Whips Up The Action
The repaved Kansas Speedway whipped up the action starting with its 200-miler for the Truck Series, a race where the draft kicked in like the series hasn't seen on an intermediate in years and passing up front was heavy, but so were the wrecks, notably Todd Bodine's nasty melee.
That the Trucks saw a drafting effect kick in showed anew what is missing from modern NASCAR and what makes the intermediates better racetracks than the short tracks or dirt ovals such as what the Trucks will race at Eldora. It is an even more pronounced problem with the cars; where back in the day the draft meant something even on intermediates and flat superovals like Pocono, Michigan, and Ontario, it has been almost entirely MIA in Cup for over a generation.
The Truck 200 at Kansas also showed anew the other big problem the sport has - the speeds are too fast. The Trucks run tapered spacers so that helps, but it didn't work for them at Kansas; it indicates a need for more restriction. Certainly the Truck racing was very good and has been for the Trucks on the much-maligned intermediates, notably with memorable battles for first at Texas and Atlanta last season and this Kansas shootout, and what made it good - the above-mentioned draft - is what the sport needs along with reduction in horsepower to get back. It's a fact the Cup Series still hasn't gotten right. The 400-miler saw its own share of hard crashes - highlighted by Kyle Busch's ugly ricochet into Joey Logano - and also saw a dearth of passing. The repaved Kansas track showcased a bizarre problem - for all the talk about downforce (shown in Todd Bodine's silly post-wreck rant) the Kansas track was criticized by several drivers for not having any grip with some criticism also aimed at the matchup of the car, the track, and the tires.
The 400 showed anew the loss of competitive momentum that has hit the Generation Six racecar after encouraging races in March. Given NASCAR's seemingly desperate push to promote the Generation Six (their earlier citation of scoring loop data showcasing an increase in lead changes, official and otherwise) it's bad news that passing has dropped since the Fontana melee.
The Gen-6's next test is Richmond Saturday night, but Talladega at the start of May will be the true next big test - Daytona was a fiasco for the Generation Six, and for the Winston 500 the excuses about lack of parts causing conservative racing won't apply. If the Gen-6 produces another Talladega thriller then NASCAR will have turned a corner.
That the Trucks saw a drafting effect kick in showed anew what is missing from modern NASCAR and what makes the intermediates better racetracks than the short tracks or dirt ovals such as what the Trucks will race at Eldora. It is an even more pronounced problem with the cars; where back in the day the draft meant something even on intermediates and flat superovals like Pocono, Michigan, and Ontario, it has been almost entirely MIA in Cup for over a generation.
The Truck 200 at Kansas also showed anew the other big problem the sport has - the speeds are too fast. The Trucks run tapered spacers so that helps, but it didn't work for them at Kansas; it indicates a need for more restriction. Certainly the Truck racing was very good and has been for the Trucks on the much-maligned intermediates, notably with memorable battles for first at Texas and Atlanta last season and this Kansas shootout, and what made it good - the above-mentioned draft - is what the sport needs along with reduction in horsepower to get back. It's a fact the Cup Series still hasn't gotten right. The 400-miler saw its own share of hard crashes - highlighted by Kyle Busch's ugly ricochet into Joey Logano - and also saw a dearth of passing. The repaved Kansas track showcased a bizarre problem - for all the talk about downforce (shown in Todd Bodine's silly post-wreck rant) the Kansas track was criticized by several drivers for not having any grip with some criticism also aimed at the matchup of the car, the track, and the tires.
The 400 showed anew the loss of competitive momentum that has hit the Generation Six racecar after encouraging races in March. Given NASCAR's seemingly desperate push to promote the Generation Six (their earlier citation of scoring loop data showcasing an increase in lead changes, official and otherwise) it's bad news that passing has dropped since the Fontana melee.
The Gen-6's next test is Richmond Saturday night, but Talladega at the start of May will be the true next big test - Daytona was a fiasco for the Generation Six, and for the Winston 500 the excuses about lack of parts causing conservative racing won't apply. If the Gen-6 produces another Talladega thriller then NASCAR will have turned a corner.
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Giffords's Husband Needs To Shut Up
THIS WAS FIRST POSTED ON APRIL 16:
The husband of former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords is whining that the "Gun Lobby" is More Powerful than Obama.
So what?
It's more and more clear that gun control isn't going to pass in Congress, and there is a reason for that - gun control doesn't work. The "gun lobby" is the convenient excuse by Democrats who can't bear to admit they're wrong.
UPDATE: The Toomey-Manchin gun control bill died, losing 56-44. Obama called it a "shameful day in Congress." He has no right to talk.
So what?
It's more and more clear that gun control isn't going to pass in Congress, and there is a reason for that - gun control doesn't work. The "gun lobby" is the convenient excuse by Democrats who can't bear to admit they're wrong.
UPDATE: The Toomey-Manchin gun control bill died, losing 56-44. Obama called it a "shameful day in Congress." He has no right to talk.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Obama's Use Of The Term Terrorism
It took over a day before Barack Obama brought himself to identify the bombing in Boston as "terrorism." Why he does this says everything about Obama's foolishness.
Monday, April 15, 2013
Sunday, April 14, 2013
From Texas To Thompson
As April thaws further out racing begins stepping up, and touring series under NASCAR sanction outside of the big three of Cup, Nationwide, and the Trucks start getting into gear. Such was the case a night after NASCAR's Texas 500, a race where a doltish Senator's demand that the race not be broadcast because of National Rifle Association sponsorship of it provided more fireworks than the racing itself - a controversy quickly lapped by bouts of "cheating by the Penske Fords before the race and then flunking of postrace inspection by runner-up Martin Truex. Keselowski in particular was angry, claiming the Penske Fords had been "targeted" by NASCAR. "We're not going to take it," he added.
The "cheating" by the Penske Fords supposedly involved beating NASCAR inspection to suppress rearend "skewing" that had become popular in 2012 by Jimmie Johnson but which now is disallowed by NASCAR; how they did it isn't clear though the story is they used a "floating" rearend. Of course it's not a simple case of NASCAR politics or a team being brazen in its cheating, because in the heavily political and often murky world of NASCAR there's reason to believe both sides - politics in racing are as old as racing (see for just one example such cases as Junior Johnson's outsized engine at Charlotte in May 1991 and the following revealation of excessive fuel storage in his Ford at the same track in October 1991) and so is cheating - and to use an old Sam Moses line, cheating, or as Bill Gazaway would put it, fudging, or as Richard Petty put it, just trying to get an edge.
There of course is the reality of the raceteams being ahead of the inspectors in the technology arms race, which makes things murkier - how long have the Penske guys been able to get away with rearend skew before getting caught? And chances are other teams will slip something past NASCAR inspectors, and when the racing is genuinely good then "cheating" issues tend to alleviate themselves.
This certainly was the case at Thompson Speedway's Icebreaker the afternoon following the Texas 500. The Whelen Modified Tour was the primary feature but multiple racecar classes strutted their stuff, with two great battles in particular standing out - the limited sportsman feature was decided in a terrific five-lap shootout won by Larry Barnett, who raced nose to nose with Jesse Gleason - Gleason and Barnett drove mid-80s Monte Carlos, but Gleason's car sported a 1988 Buick nosepiece, a charming hybrid surpassed only by Seekonk's Late Models where several have 1990s Monte Carlo noses but latter-80s Monte Carlo bubble-glass bodies - with Gleason killing Barnett high in One and Two - sporting a somewhat pronounced dip in the middle - but Barnett beating everyone alive on the backstrtech.
The second thriller was the SK-class Modified shootout. Keith Rocco, Woody Pitkat, and Kerry Malone got into an exciting battle for the win in the final ten laps and there were some three lead changes involving crossover passing - except Pitkat's last crossover crossed him out of contention off Two with three to go.
Not that the Modified Tour race was any slouch. Numerous cautions flew thanks to a rough day for Gary McDonald, but the worst yellow came near halfway of the 150-lapper thanks to a nasty crash in One involving Ron Yuhas - unsung hero of New Hampshire International Speedway in 2006 - and Ron Fuller, a crash necessitating a red flag.
Lap 111 saw another yellow and Mike Stefanik - the polesitter who got knocked out of the top six on the opening lap - got tires while Rowan Pennick and Chuck Hossfeld gambled on tires and stayed out. Several late yellows helped Stefanik close up on Pennick, and the final restart with 11 to go was decisive as Pennick surprisingly lost the lead despite starting on the outside row - the preferred line for most of the day. Even with losing the lead Stefanik's new tires didn't allow him to get away from Pennick, as Mike won by only a couple of lengths.
Curiously, Stefanik was self-depricating in victory lane about the whole thing as he posted the win with a new team.
Before the race Justin Bonsignore stated the Hoosier Tires the Tour runs, "They'll last at least eighty-five or ninty laps if we have to....here at Thompson you probably want new tires." It certainly proved the case, and also showed "there's a lot of good quality cars (in the Modified Tour).....There's still ten to fifteen cars that can win every week."
The Tour has often been seen as the red-headed stepchild in the NASCAR scheme of things, and "the cost of racing has gone up, but the cost of everything has gone up," says Bonsignore. "I think it's a little out of hand now. If they make big changes to try and cut costs, it's going to cost us more up front again. It might save you money in the long run."
One such area is spec motors, which seem to be creeping into the Tour, though there also seems to be a diversity of engine builders/suppliers still. Billy The Kid engines and Bob Bruneau, long-time engine figures on the Tour, are still common in the garage area, and some Tour cars run Rahmoc engines - yes, the company that once upon a time fielded super-strong Pontiacs for Neil Bonnett and Morgan Shepherd. A Grand National Series branded spec motor built by Roush-Yates is also to be found in the Mod Tour garage area.
The cost issue plagues racing at all levels, but in the end exciting finishes such as seen at Thompson's Icebreaker make the hassles all worth it.
The "cheating" by the Penske Fords supposedly involved beating NASCAR inspection to suppress rearend "skewing" that had become popular in 2012 by Jimmie Johnson but which now is disallowed by NASCAR; how they did it isn't clear though the story is they used a "floating" rearend. Of course it's not a simple case of NASCAR politics or a team being brazen in its cheating, because in the heavily political and often murky world of NASCAR there's reason to believe both sides - politics in racing are as old as racing (see for just one example such cases as Junior Johnson's outsized engine at Charlotte in May 1991 and the following revealation of excessive fuel storage in his Ford at the same track in October 1991) and so is cheating - and to use an old Sam Moses line, cheating, or as Bill Gazaway would put it, fudging, or as Richard Petty put it, just trying to get an edge.
There of course is the reality of the raceteams being ahead of the inspectors in the technology arms race, which makes things murkier - how long have the Penske guys been able to get away with rearend skew before getting caught? And chances are other teams will slip something past NASCAR inspectors, and when the racing is genuinely good then "cheating" issues tend to alleviate themselves.
This certainly was the case at Thompson Speedway's Icebreaker the afternoon following the Texas 500. The Whelen Modified Tour was the primary feature but multiple racecar classes strutted their stuff, with two great battles in particular standing out - the limited sportsman feature was decided in a terrific five-lap shootout won by Larry Barnett, who raced nose to nose with Jesse Gleason - Gleason and Barnett drove mid-80s Monte Carlos, but Gleason's car sported a 1988 Buick nosepiece, a charming hybrid surpassed only by Seekonk's Late Models where several have 1990s Monte Carlo noses but latter-80s Monte Carlo bubble-glass bodies - with Gleason killing Barnett high in One and Two - sporting a somewhat pronounced dip in the middle - but Barnett beating everyone alive on the backstrtech.
The second thriller was the SK-class Modified shootout. Keith Rocco, Woody Pitkat, and Kerry Malone got into an exciting battle for the win in the final ten laps and there were some three lead changes involving crossover passing - except Pitkat's last crossover crossed him out of contention off Two with three to go.
Not that the Modified Tour race was any slouch. Numerous cautions flew thanks to a rough day for Gary McDonald, but the worst yellow came near halfway of the 150-lapper thanks to a nasty crash in One involving Ron Yuhas - unsung hero of New Hampshire International Speedway in 2006 - and Ron Fuller, a crash necessitating a red flag.
Lap 111 saw another yellow and Mike Stefanik - the polesitter who got knocked out of the top six on the opening lap - got tires while Rowan Pennick and Chuck Hossfeld gambled on tires and stayed out. Several late yellows helped Stefanik close up on Pennick, and the final restart with 11 to go was decisive as Pennick surprisingly lost the lead despite starting on the outside row - the preferred line for most of the day. Even with losing the lead Stefanik's new tires didn't allow him to get away from Pennick, as Mike won by only a couple of lengths.
Curiously, Stefanik was self-depricating in victory lane about the whole thing as he posted the win with a new team.
Before the race Justin Bonsignore stated the Hoosier Tires the Tour runs, "They'll last at least eighty-five or ninty laps if we have to....here at Thompson you probably want new tires." It certainly proved the case, and also showed "there's a lot of good quality cars (in the Modified Tour).....There's still ten to fifteen cars that can win every week."
The Tour has often been seen as the red-headed stepchild in the NASCAR scheme of things, and "the cost of racing has gone up, but the cost of everything has gone up," says Bonsignore. "I think it's a little out of hand now. If they make big changes to try and cut costs, it's going to cost us more up front again. It might save you money in the long run."
One such area is spec motors, which seem to be creeping into the Tour, though there also seems to be a diversity of engine builders/suppliers still. Billy The Kid engines and Bob Bruneau, long-time engine figures on the Tour, are still common in the garage area, and some Tour cars run Rahmoc engines - yes, the company that once upon a time fielded super-strong Pontiacs for Neil Bonnett and Morgan Shepherd. A Grand National Series branded spec motor built by Roush-Yates is also to be found in the Mod Tour garage area.
The cost issue plagues racing at all levels, but in the end exciting finishes such as seen at Thompson's Icebreaker make the hassles all worth it.
Thursday, April 11, 2013
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Sizing Up NASCAR Entering Texas
Mike Mulhern authors a good thorough examination of the Winston Cup season so far, with particular attention focused on the NASCAR policy where a driver has to start the race in order to get championship points plus the separate driver points and owner points dichotomy in the sport.
I'm not in favor of allowing a substitute driver to earn points for another driver, because for all the hype about racing being a team sport - and certainly teams do matter as far as the building of the racecars etc. - in its essence the sport is one driver racing a racecar vs. 42 other drivers racing racecars. The analogy to NFL teams using backup quarterbacks when the starter gets injured fails because in the NFL multiple participants are on the field at the same time as a single unit facing another such unit; in racing it is one car vs. another car vs. another car etc. An individual racecar represents less a team than an individual, be it the driver or the car owner (i.e. the #43 as Richard Petty's car regardless of who the driver is); even the car number often reflects an individual driver (remember the insane controversy over the #8 when Dale Earnhardt Jr. switched to Hendrick Motorsports?) as opposed to a team.
The concern is because of injured drivers trying to race instead of sitting out races. Certainly NASCAR needs to stand up more and bench injured drivers to heal up a lot more than the sanctioning body presently does. But it should not basically reward being injured.
-----------------
As far as the racing goes, the Generation Six got off to the dismal start, then picked up at Bristol and the surprisingly raucous California 400 before tailing off at Martinsville. Texas will be a test of the Generation Six, for if it puts on memorable racing up front - the sport needs races in addition to Daytona and Talladega that even flirt with 60 lead changes - then it will be making believers out of people who still have reason not to buy into the concept. Goodyear is bringing a new right side tire to Texas, which adds another question mark.
-----------------
As far as individual racecars, Brad Keselowski has the best average finish of all drivers, but hasn't won, while Joey Logano got into two scrapes at Martinsville. The Penske effect extends into the Ford fleet, where as expected his bunch is ahead and it's coming at the expense of the other Fords. The Toyotas of JGR have won twice and Kyle Busch is fourth in points, while the Hendrick Chevys led by Jimmie Johnson are of course above everyone else.
Falling the deepest has been Tony Stewart and his fleet - a result to be expected given the fall of Danica Patrick's other raceteams when she raced Indycar. Also embarrassing is RCR, where the inept Paul Menard is in the top ten in points and Kevin Harvick is riding out his string at RCR while Jeff Burton is going nowhere in every sense of the term. While on the Toyota side, Michael Waltrip's team gets Clint Bowyer and as usual nothing else.
Outside of this, no one else has done anything of note in the series so far. STP's sponsorship of the Virginia 500 was a very nice gesture but they didn't get anything out of Aric Almirola as his career continues to go nowhere - a further insult to Petty's #43 (and Mulhern asks a good question in noting the lack of information of Michael Annett after his Daytona crash). The Ganassi Chevys are in even worse shape as Juan Montoya's lack of stock car moxie curiously keeps getting overlooked while Jamie McMurray can only be known as a one-shot wonder.
So the sport enters Texas for the seventeenth season of this tumultuous track's existence hoping to accelerate positive momentum.
I'm not in favor of allowing a substitute driver to earn points for another driver, because for all the hype about racing being a team sport - and certainly teams do matter as far as the building of the racecars etc. - in its essence the sport is one driver racing a racecar vs. 42 other drivers racing racecars. The analogy to NFL teams using backup quarterbacks when the starter gets injured fails because in the NFL multiple participants are on the field at the same time as a single unit facing another such unit; in racing it is one car vs. another car vs. another car etc. An individual racecar represents less a team than an individual, be it the driver or the car owner (i.e. the #43 as Richard Petty's car regardless of who the driver is); even the car number often reflects an individual driver (remember the insane controversy over the #8 when Dale Earnhardt Jr. switched to Hendrick Motorsports?) as opposed to a team.
The concern is because of injured drivers trying to race instead of sitting out races. Certainly NASCAR needs to stand up more and bench injured drivers to heal up a lot more than the sanctioning body presently does. But it should not basically reward being injured.
-----------------
As far as the racing goes, the Generation Six got off to the dismal start, then picked up at Bristol and the surprisingly raucous California 400 before tailing off at Martinsville. Texas will be a test of the Generation Six, for if it puts on memorable racing up front - the sport needs races in addition to Daytona and Talladega that even flirt with 60 lead changes - then it will be making believers out of people who still have reason not to buy into the concept. Goodyear is bringing a new right side tire to Texas, which adds another question mark.
-----------------
As far as individual racecars, Brad Keselowski has the best average finish of all drivers, but hasn't won, while Joey Logano got into two scrapes at Martinsville. The Penske effect extends into the Ford fleet, where as expected his bunch is ahead and it's coming at the expense of the other Fords. The Toyotas of JGR have won twice and Kyle Busch is fourth in points, while the Hendrick Chevys led by Jimmie Johnson are of course above everyone else.
Falling the deepest has been Tony Stewart and his fleet - a result to be expected given the fall of Danica Patrick's other raceteams when she raced Indycar. Also embarrassing is RCR, where the inept Paul Menard is in the top ten in points and Kevin Harvick is riding out his string at RCR while Jeff Burton is going nowhere in every sense of the term. While on the Toyota side, Michael Waltrip's team gets Clint Bowyer and as usual nothing else.
Outside of this, no one else has done anything of note in the series so far. STP's sponsorship of the Virginia 500 was a very nice gesture but they didn't get anything out of Aric Almirola as his career continues to go nowhere - a further insult to Petty's #43 (and Mulhern asks a good question in noting the lack of information of Michael Annett after his Daytona crash). The Ganassi Chevys are in even worse shape as Juan Montoya's lack of stock car moxie curiously keeps getting overlooked while Jamie McMurray can only be known as a one-shot wonder.
So the sport enters Texas for the seventeenth season of this tumultuous track's existence hoping to accelerate positive momentum.
Tuesday, April 09, 2013
Monday, April 08, 2013
Sunday, April 07, 2013
Martinsville Pick Six
The 2013 Virginia 500 has come and gone and six items are worth analyzing -
The "fall off" tire didn't make the racing better - much was made of Goodyear's tire that was meant to produce greater wear and thus "fall off" more. The argument was it would produce better racing and put it back into the drivers hands. Neither happened in the Cup race. Jimmie Johnson led 346 laps and was almost never challenged, even on late restarts. Drivers were talking about "You can't abuse the tires." It showed; they didn't try to abuse the tires and thus they didn't race particularly hard. Even with that Chad Knaus was still arguing for more abrasive tires claiming tracks with less tire wear "the racing is not as good, because the line selection is minimized."
It's also not much of an endorsement of the Generation Six racecar after some encouraging signs the previous three races.
Danica Patrick actually raced well - and yet it is damning of the quality of the racing that she was basically the only interesting competitive angle all day. Finishing 12th was shocking - by her own admission - and it was the only area all day where anything interesting was happening. Her Stewart-Haas teammates certainly didn't do anything all race; Ryan Newman in particular was embarrassing when he stopped to bring out a yellow and got a three-lap penalty as a result..
Joey Logano, no-show - He got into a scrape during practice and another during the race, but other than that NASCAR's newest "star" was MIA.
Yet another sign Kevin Harvick will drive for Stewart-Haas Racing - after Brian Vickers played bumper tag with Danica Patrick at the finish, Harvick spun him out. Patrick is presumably Harvick's teammate in 2014.
RCR is in serious trouble - 8th, 14th, and 24th in standings isn't particularly encouraging - of the organization's combined five top ten finishes three are the result of Paul Menard, who is assured of a fast fall from contention as the season goes on. Keep an eye on the rumored switch to Dodge in 2014 for RCR and potentially two other teams, because it's obvious Chevrolet isn't keeping RCR in the fold.
Which "name" driver will get the in-season axe first? - I'm going to guess Juan Montoya doesn't finish the season with the woeful Ganassi/Earnhardt squad. Clearly overrated when he signed with Ganassi's Dodge fleet in 2007, it's amazing he won two races, and despite a paucity of results - 51 top tens isn't bad but for the talent he ostensibly has it's pretty thin gruel - he's won $33 million in NASCAR.
And so with Martinsville out of the way the Cup series heads to Texas.
The "fall off" tire didn't make the racing better - much was made of Goodyear's tire that was meant to produce greater wear and thus "fall off" more. The argument was it would produce better racing and put it back into the drivers hands. Neither happened in the Cup race. Jimmie Johnson led 346 laps and was almost never challenged, even on late restarts. Drivers were talking about "You can't abuse the tires." It showed; they didn't try to abuse the tires and thus they didn't race particularly hard. Even with that Chad Knaus was still arguing for more abrasive tires claiming tracks with less tire wear "the racing is not as good, because the line selection is minimized."
It's also not much of an endorsement of the Generation Six racecar after some encouraging signs the previous three races.
Danica Patrick actually raced well - and yet it is damning of the quality of the racing that she was basically the only interesting competitive angle all day. Finishing 12th was shocking - by her own admission - and it was the only area all day where anything interesting was happening. Her Stewart-Haas teammates certainly didn't do anything all race; Ryan Newman in particular was embarrassing when he stopped to bring out a yellow and got a three-lap penalty as a result..
Joey Logano, no-show - He got into a scrape during practice and another during the race, but other than that NASCAR's newest "star" was MIA.
Yet another sign Kevin Harvick will drive for Stewart-Haas Racing - after Brian Vickers played bumper tag with Danica Patrick at the finish, Harvick spun him out. Patrick is presumably Harvick's teammate in 2014.
RCR is in serious trouble - 8th, 14th, and 24th in standings isn't particularly encouraging - of the organization's combined five top ten finishes three are the result of Paul Menard, who is assured of a fast fall from contention as the season goes on. Keep an eye on the rumored switch to Dodge in 2014 for RCR and potentially two other teams, because it's obvious Chevrolet isn't keeping RCR in the fold.
Which "name" driver will get the in-season axe first? - I'm going to guess Juan Montoya doesn't finish the season with the woeful Ganassi/Earnhardt squad. Clearly overrated when he signed with Ganassi's Dodge fleet in 2007, it's amazing he won two races, and despite a paucity of results - 51 top tens isn't bad but for the talent he ostensibly has it's pretty thin gruel - he's won $33 million in NASCAR.
And so with Martinsville out of the way the Cup series heads to Texas.
Saturday, April 06, 2013
Thursday, April 04, 2013
Wednesday, April 03, 2013
Monday, April 01, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)